Multi-Stage High Shear Mixing for Drilling Fluid Rheology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling fluid mixing techniques are inadequate, leading to agglomerates, molecular degradation, and inefficient rheological properties, resulting in cost inefficiencies and performance failures downhole due to inadequate high shear mixing and hydration issues with polymer additives.

Innovation Solution

The use of multiple stage high shear mixing units with rotor/stator designs that apply centrifugal force and hydraulic shear to drilling fluids, dispersing additives while preserving polymer chains and maintaining fluid stability, reducing the need for high-pressure mixing equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional mixing techniques are used, then the mixing process is simple, but agglomerates form and rheological properties are inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing uniformityVSAvoidmixing apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing process is divided into multiple stages with different shear rates. The high shear mixer uses a rotor-stator configuration where the rotor rotates at high speed to create intense shear forces, followed by a low shear stage for gentle blending. This segmentation allows each stage to perform its specific function optimally, preventing agglomerate formation while avoiding molecular degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mixing system employs variable speed rotation of the rotor to dynamically adjust shear rates during the mixing process. The rotor speed can be controlled to provide high shear initially for dispersion, then reduced for final blending, adapting the mixing intensity to the specific needs of different additives and fluid states throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If high-pressure mixing equipment is used, then mixing effectiveness improves, but equipment cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid stabilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces high-pressure mechanical mixing systems with a high shear rotor-stator system that generates intense mixing forces through rotational shear rather than pressure. The rotor rotates at controlled speeds to create shear forces that effectively disperse additives and maintain fluid stability without requiring high-pressure equipment, thereby reducing equipment complexity and cost while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If high shear mixing is applied, then additive dispersion improves, but polymer chains may degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadditive dispersionVSAvoidpolymer chain integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing process is segmented into high shear and low shear stages. The high shear stage briefly disperses additives to break up agglomerates, then transitions to a low shear stage for gentle final blending. This segmentation ensures adequate additive dispersion while limiting the duration and intensity of shear exposure to protect polymer chains from degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mixing process uses periodic cycles of high and low shear rates. The rotor alternates between high-speed rotation for dispersion and lower-speed rotation for gentle blending, creating a periodic action that achieves thorough additive distribution while allowing polymer chains to recover between high-shear episodes, preventing cumulative degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach produces drilling fluids with improved rheological profiles, reducing the formation of cuttings beds, minimizing pressure requirements, and maintaining fluid stability, thereby enhancing drilling efficiency and reducing operational costs by extending the life of mixing unit components and minimizing rig downtime.

Implementation Method 1

The use of multiple stage high shear mixing units with rotor/stator designs that apply centrifugal force and hydraulic shear to drilling fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

The use of multiple stage high shear mixing units with rotor/stator designs that apply centrifugal force and hydraulic shear to drilling fluids, dispersing additives while preserving polymer chains and maintaining fluid stability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic shear: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS9145747B2Methods and apparatuses for mixing drilling fluids
Publication Date: 2015.09.29 M I DRILLING FLUIDS CANADA INC
  • US9145747B2 patent drawing
  • US9145747B2 patent drawing
  • US9145747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of mixing drilling fluids, the method including injecting a drilling fluid into a high shear mixing unit and processing the drilling fluid with the high shear mixing unit. The processing includes forcing the drilling fluid through a first row of teeth of a first stage.