Turbine Engine High-Speed Shaft Rating for Stable Bypass Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine engines with higher bypass ratios face instability due to reduced stiffness-to-weight ratio and increased excitation of bending modes, leading to excessive vibrations and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Optimized shaft geometries and materials, such as ceramic matrix composites, combined with additive manufacturing, to enhance shaft stability and reduce vibrations, allowing for higher redline speeds and improved engine performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If higher bypass ratios are used to improve engine efficiency, then fuel efficiency improves, but shaft stability deteriorates due to reduced stiffness-to-weight ratio and increased bending mode excitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidshaft stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials, specifically ceramic matrix composites (CMCs), to shaft components to achieve higher stiffness-to-weight ratios. This allows the shaft to maintain stability at higher bypass ratios while reducing overall weight, thereby resolving the contradiction between fuel efficiency and shaft stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes material parameters by transitioning from traditional metals to ceramic matrix composites, fundamentally altering the stiffness-to-weight ratio. This parameter change enables the shaft to withstand higher bypass ratios without excessive vibrations, simultaneously improving fuel efficiency and maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional materials and geometries are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but shaft vibrations increase at higher bypass ratios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidshaft vibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using additive manufacturing to create non-uniform shaft geometries with varying cross-sectional properties along the shaft length. This allows optimization of stiffness distribution to reduce vibrations at specific locations while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through additive processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dimensional complexity by moving from traditional uniform cylindrical geometries to three-dimensionally optimized shaft structures. Additive manufacturing enables complex spatial configurations that improve vibration characteristics while remaining manufacturable through advanced additive processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Stability of the object's composition

If shaft stiffness is increased to reduce vibrations, then shaft stability improves, but engine core length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft stabilityVSAvoidengine core length
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses ceramic matrix composites to achieve higher stiffness-to-weight ratios, allowing increased shaft stiffness without proportionally increasing length. The superior material properties enable compact shaft designs that maintain stability while minimizing engine core length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes shaft dynamics by carefully tuning the stiffness distribution and natural frequencies of the shaft system. This dynamic optimization allows the shaft to achieve adequate stability with minimized length by avoiding resonance conditions and optimizing modal characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12421918B1High-speed shaft rating for turbine engines
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US12421918B1 patent drawing
  • US12421918B1 patent drawing
  • US12421918B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbomachine engine includes an engine core including a high-pressure compressor, a high-pressure turbine, and a combustion chamber in flow communication with the high-pressure compressor and the high-pressure turbine. The engine core has a length (LCORE), and the high-pressure compressor has an exit stage diameter (DCORE). A high-pressure shaft is coupled to the high-pressure compressor and the high-pressure turbine. The high-pressure shaft is characterized by a high-speed shaft rating (HSR) from 1.5 to 6.2, and a ratio of LCORE/DCORE is from 2.1 to 4.3.