High-Strength Multi-Phase Steel for Low-Temperature Burring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-phase steels face challenges in achieving high strength and excellent burring properties at low temperatures due to issues such as microstructural ununiformity, increased rolling loads, and deteriorated formability and weldability caused by excessive alloying elements and cooling conditions.

Innovation Solution

A high strength multi-phase steel composition with controlled alloying elements (C, Si, Mn, Al, Cr, Mo, P, S, N, Nb, Ti, V, B) and a specific microstructure (97-99% ferrite and bainite, 1-3% martensite-austenite) is produced through controlled reheating, hot-rolling, and multi-stage cooling processes to maintain optimal phase ratios and dislocation density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If alloying elements (Si, Mn, Al, Mo, Cr) are added in excessively amounts to improve strength and stretch flangeability, then strength is improved, but segregation of alloy components and ununiformity of microstructure occur, causing stretch flangeability to deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidstretch flangeability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the content ranges of alloying elements (Si: 0.01-1.0%, Mn: 1.0-3.0%, Al: 0.01-0.1%, Cr: 0.005-1.0%, Mo: 0.003-0.3%) and implementing multi-stage cooling processes with specific temperature rates to achieve uniform microstructure and maintain stretch flangeability while achieving high strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different microstructural phases (ferrite, bainite, martensite-austenite) with specific area ratios (ferrite+bainite: 97-99%, MA: 1-3%) and controlling austenite grain size distribution to achieve both high strength and excellent burring properties in different regions of the steel microstructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If precipitate forming elements (Ti, Nb, V) are excessively used to obtain high strength, then strength is improved, but rolling load increases due to delay of recrystallization during hot-rolling, making it difficult to produce thin products and formability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the content of precipitate forming elements (Ti: 0.005-0.13%, Nb: 0.005-0.06%, V: 0.003-0.2%) and implementing multi-stage cooling processes to achieve high strength without excessive rolling load and maintain formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing air-cooling at the first cooling end temperature (500-700°C) for 3-10 seconds before the second cooling stage, which preliminarily controls the microstructure formation and prevents excessive rolling load during hot-rolling while maintaining subsequent formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If C and N content are increased to obtain high bake hardenability, then BH value is improved, but microstructural ununiformity and susceptibility to microstructural changes occur depending on cooling conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebake hardenabilityVSAvoidmicrostructural uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling C (0.05-0.14%) and N (0.001-0.01%) content and calculating the modified carbon equivalent [C]* to achieve high bake hardenability while maintaining microstructural uniformity and stability against cooling condition changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using the calculated [C]* value (0.022-0.10) and Relationship 1 ([Mn]+2.8[Mo]+1.5[Cr]+500[B]≤4.0) as control criteria to feedback-adjust the alloy composition and cooling parameters, ensuring consistent microstructure and bake hardenability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves tensile strengths of 590 MPa or more with excellent burring properties at low temperatures, demonstrated by a Hole Expanding Ratio (HER) of 30,000 MPa% or more at -30°C, and improved bake hardenability.

Implementation Method 1

the sum of area ratios of ferrite and bainite is 97% to 99%, an area ratio of martensite and austenite (MA) is 1% to 3%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

precipitate forming elements such as titanium (Ti), niobium (Nb), and vanadium (V)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentUS12435383B2High strength multi-phase steel having excellent burring properties at low temperature, and method for producing same
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD
  • US12435383B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a high strength multi-phase steel having excellent burring properties at low temperature, and a method for producing the same. More specifically, provided are a high strength multi-phase steel having excellent burring properties at low temperature, and a method for producing the same, wherein the multi-phase steel can be appropriately used as a member, a lower arm, a reinforcement material, a connection material, or the like for a vehicle chassis component.