High-Strength Steel Sheet Microstructure for Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high strength steel sheets with tensile strengths of 1320 MPa or more face challenges in achieving sufficient elongation (El ≥ 8%) and a wide range of appropriate clearances for hole expanding deformation without causing delayed fracture, which are not adequately addressed by existing technologies.

Innovation Solution

The steel composition is optimized with limited ferrite and bainitic ferrite to 10% or less, retained austenite to 15% or less, carbon concentration in retained austenite to 0.50% or more, and specific hardness and kernel average misorientation ratios, combined with controlled microstructural features to achieve the desired properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high strength steel sheets with tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more are used to reduce vehicle weight and enhance crashworthiness, then strength is improved, but elongation becomes insufficient and formability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling microstructural parameters including the volume fraction of retained austenite (5-15%), carbon concentration in retained austenite (0.50% or more), and the ratio of Kernel Average Misorientation (KAM) values. These parameter optimizations enable the steel to achieve tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more while maintaining elongation of 8% or more, thereby resolving the contradiction between strength and formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If shear clearance is reduced to improve hole expanding deformation, then formability is improved, but delayed fracture resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole expanding deformationVSAvoiddelayed fracture resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by optimizing the microstructural parameters including retained austenite volume fraction (5-15%) and carbon concentration in retained austenite (0.50% or more). These parameter optimizations create a microstructure that can accommodate hole expanding deformation with appropriate shear clearance while maintaining delayed fracture resistance, thus resolving the contradiction between formability and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If shear clearance is increased to improve delayed fracture resistance, then reliability is improved, but hole expanding deformation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelayed fracture resistanceVSAvoidhole expanding deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the volume fraction of retained austenite (5-15%) and carbon concentration in retained austenite (0.50% or more). These optimized parameters create a microstructure that simultaneously provides good delayed fracture resistance and accommodates hole expanding deformation with appropriate shear clearance, resolving the contradiction between reliability and formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4332254B1High-strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2025.10.08 JFE STEEL CORP
  • EP4332254B1 patent drawing
  • EP4332254B1 patent drawing
  • EP4332254B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Objects are to provide a high strength steel sheet having a TS of 1320 MPa or more and an El of 8% or more and having a wide range of appropriate clearances for hole expanding deformation and a wide range of appropriate clearances not leading to delayed fracture; and to provide a method for manufacturing the same. A high strength steel sheet includes a specific microstructure having a specific chemical composition and satisfying the formulas (1) and (2) defined below: KAMS/KAMC<1.00 wherein KAM (S) is a KAM (Kernel average misorientation) value of a superficial portion of the steel sheet, and KAM (C) is a KAM value of a central portion of the steel sheet, HvQ−HvS≥8 wherein Hv (Q) indicates the hardness of a portion at 1/4 sheet thickness and Hv (S) indicates the hardness of a superficial portion of the steel sheet.