High-Strength Steel Sheet Microstructure Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-strength steel sheets face challenges in achieving a balance between high strength, ductility, and formability, particularly in terms of hole expandability and bendability, due to limitations in chemical composition and manufacturing processes, which affect their practical application in automotive and industrial uses.

Innovation Solution

A high-strength steel sheet with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more is developed, featuring a specific composition range of elements like C, Si, Mn, P, S, N, Al, and Ti, along with a tailored manufacturing process involving hot rolling, cold rolling, and heat treatment to stabilize retained austenite, ensuring excellent ductility and hole expandability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of the steel sheet is increased, then the tensile strength improves, but the formability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the chemical composition parameters (C: 0.03-0.35%, Si: 0.5-3.0%, Mn: 3.5-10.0%, P: 0.01-0.1%, S: 0.001-0.02%, N: 0.001-0.01%) and heat treatment parameters (heating temperature: 800-950°C, holding time: 1-10 hours, cooling rate: 5-50°C/min) to achieve a microstructure with 20-50% ferrite, 5-25% bainitic ferrite, and 5-20% martensite, along with 10% or more retained austenite with mean grain size of 2 μm or less, thereby simultaneously achieving high strength (TS ≥ 980 MPa) and excellent formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure containing multiple phases (ferrite, bainitic ferrite, martensite, and retained austenite) with specific proportions and characteristics. The retained austenite with high Mn content (at least 1.2 times the Mn content in the steel sheet) and low grain size (2 μm or less) acts as a reinforcement phase that transforms during deformation, providing both strength and ductility, thus resolving the contradiction between strength and formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the strength of the steel sheet is increased, then the tensile strength improves, but the ductility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes phase transitions of steel, specifically the retention of austenite phase and its subsequent transformation. The retained austenite with controlled composition (high Mn content) and microstructure (fine grain size of 2 μm or less) remains stable at room temperature but transforms during plastic deformation, providing TRIP effect that enhances ductility while maintaining high strength. The microstructure includes 20-50% ferrite, 5-25% bainitic ferrite, and 5-20% martensite, with the phase transition behavior enabling both high strength (TS ≥ 980 MPa) and excellent ductility (EL ≥ 20%)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Strength

If the strength of the steel sheet is increased, then the tensile strength improves, but the hole expandability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidhole expandability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the chemical composition (particularly Mn: 3.5-10.0% and C: 0.03-0.35%) and heat treatment parameters (heating temperature: 800-950°C, holding time: 1-10 hours, cooling rate: 5-50°C/min) to achieve a microstructure with fine retained austenite grains (2 μm or less) and specific phase distribution. This results in a steel sheet with TS ≥ 980 MPa and excellent hole expandability (λ ≥ 35% for punched holes), resolving the contradiction between strength and hole expandability through controlled microstructural parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting steel sheet exhibits enhanced formability, including improved ductility and hole expandability, while maintaining high tensile strength, making it suitable for industrial applications such as automobiles.

Implementation Method 1

a steel microstructure that contains, by area, 20-50 % of ferrite, 5-25 % of bainitic ferrite, and 5-20 % of martensite, and that contains, by volume, 10 % or more of retained austenite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

a high-strength steel sheet using deformation-induced transformation of retained austenite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation-induced transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

hot-rolling a steel slab, coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet, cooling the coiled steel sheet, heating and holding the cooled steel sheet, pickling the heated steel sheet, cold-rolling the pickled steel sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3778974B1High-strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2024.01.03 JFE STEEL CORP
  • EP3778974B1 patent drawing
  • EP3778974B1 patent drawing
  • EP3778974B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention has a certain component composition and a steel structure with ferrite being 35% or more and 80% or less and tempered martensite being greater than 5% and 20% or less in terms of area fraction and retained austenite being 8% or more in terms of volume fraction, in addition, an average grain size of the ferrite being 6 µm or less, an average grain size of the retained austenite being 3 µm or less, and a value obtained by dividing an area fraction of blocky austenite by a sum of area fractions of lath-like austenite and the blocky austenite being 0.6 or more, a value obtained by dividing an average Mn content (% by mass) in the retained austenite by an average Mn content (% by mass) in the ferrite being 1.5 or more, and a value obtained by dividing an average C content (% by mass) in the retained austenite by an average C content (% by mass) in the ferrite being 3.0 or more.