Hinge Closure Emergency Unlocking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hinge closures with actuating devices accessible from only one side pose a risk of entrapment, as individuals trapped inside a room cannot independently unlock the door, potentially leading to safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an emergency unlocking device that can be actuated from the inside, independent of the primary actuating device, allowing for quick separation of hinge elements and door opening, with optional coupling to the locking or actuating device for enhanced functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the actuating device is accessible from only one side of the hinge closure, then the device complexity is reduced and the ease of operation is improved for normal use, but the reliability is worsened in emergency situations where individuals trapped inside cannot unlock the door

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge closure system is segmented into two independent actuation pathways: a primary actuating device for normal operation and an emergency unlocking device for emergency situations. This segmentation allows each device to be optimized for its specific function while ensuring overall system reliability across different operational contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The emergency unlocking device acts as an intermediary mechanism that provides an alternative pathway for unlocking the hinge closure when the primary actuating device is inaccessible. This intermediary device ensures that the locking function can still be reversed in emergency situations, maintaining system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the emergency unlocking device is added to allow access from both sides, then the reliability is improved for emergency situations, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The emergency unlocking function is extracted as a separate, dedicated device rather than being integrated into the primary actuating mechanism. This extraction simplifies the design of each individual component while maintaining overall system reliability, as the emergency device can be a simple mechanical feature rather than a complex multi-functional actuator

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The emergency unlocking device is designed to be self-contained and self-explanatory, requiring no external assistance or complex activation sequences. It provides automatic, intuitive access to the unlocking function in emergency situations, reducing the need for additional control systems or complex mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11898392B2Hinge closure
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 EMKA BESCHLAGTAILE GMBH & CO KG
  • US11898392B2 patent drawing
  • US11898392B2 patent drawing
  • US11898392B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hinge closure (1) including a first hinge element (2) for arrangement on a door (4) and a second hinge element (3) for arrangement on a door frame, wherein the first hinge element (2) and the second hinge element (3) interlock via a locking device (7) an actuating device (6) actuates the locking device (7), and an emergency unlocking device (8) unlocks the two hinge elements (2, 3). In another embodiment, a door (4) includes such a hinge closure (1).