Hinge Retainer Gradient Structure for A-Pillar Crash Load Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In small overlap collisions, the A-pillar lower of a vehicle is excessively pushed inward by the collision load from the front wheel, leading to potential structural damage and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle side structure comprising an A-pillar lower reinforcement, a side member outer, a hinge retainer, and a door hinge, where the hinge retainer has a front standing wall, a side standing wall, and a top wall, with the front proof stress being greater than the rear, allowing the rear sections to bend before the front, reducing the inward push during collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the front standing wall portion of the hinge retainer is made with higher proof stress than the rear standing wall portion, then the A-pillar lower is pushed less toward the inside of the vehicle cabin during small overlap collision, but the structural complexity of the hinge retainer increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveA-pillar lower inward pushVSAvoidhinge retainer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge retainer is designed with non-uniform wall thickness distribution, where the front standing wall portion has greater thickness and higher proof stress than the rear standing wall portion. This local quality variation allows the front portion to resist collision loads more effectively, reducing A-pillar lower inward push, while the rear portion maintains sufficient strength for normal operation. The top wall portion connects these differentiated sections, creating a gradient structure that optimizes both safety and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the front standing wall portion of the hinge retainer is overlapped with the inner surface of the front wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement, then the collision load is directed to the rear sections first, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision load distributionVSAvoidoverlap positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge retainer is nested within the A-pillar lower reinforcement structure, with the front standing wall portion overlapping the inner surface of the front wall portion. This nesting arrangement allows the hinge retainer to be integrated into the existing A-pillar structure, directing collision loads to the rear sections while maintaining compact geometry. The overlapping design enables load path control without requiring separate complex mounting structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Strength

If the side member outer is overlapped with the outside of the A-pillar lower reinforcement, then the structural strength is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveA-pillar lower strengthVSAvoidside member outer configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The side member outer is merged with the A-pillar lower reinforcement structure, with the side member outer overlapping the outside of the A-pillar lower reinforcement. This merging creates an integrated structure where the side member outer and A-pillar lower reinforcement work together to resist collision loads. The combination provides enhanced structural strength while avoiding the need for separate reinforcement components, as the side member outer serves dual purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces the amount of A-pillar lower push into the vehicle cabin during small overlap collisions by directing the collision load to the rear sections first, minimizing structural deformation and enhancing safety.

Implementation Method 1

the front standing wall portion of the hinge retainer is overlapped with the inside of the front wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement. Therefore, in accordance with the input of the collision load, the rear wall portion of the side member outer and the rear wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement are bent before the front wall portion of the side member outer and the front wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement are bent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the rear wall portion of the side member outer and the rear wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement are bent before the front wall portion of the side member outer and the front wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement are bent, and the door hinge is rotated counterclockwise in a top view

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of inertia: Moment of Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS20240383535A1Vehicle side structure
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20240383535A1 patent drawing
  • US20240383535A1 patent drawing
  • US20240383535A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The hinge retainer of the vehicle side structure includes a front standing wall portion that is superimposed on an inner surface of a front wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement, a side standing wall portion that is integrally provided so as to be orthogonal to the front standing wall portion and is superimposed on an inner surface of a side wall portion of the A-pillar lower reinforcement, and a top wall portion that is integrally provided so as to bridge from an upper side of the front standing wall portion to an upper side of the side standing wall portion.