Hinged-Arm Expanding Implant With Controlled Bridging Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing orthopedic implants face challenges in efficiently expanding within the body to achieve desired deployment configurations, particularly in minimally invasive procedures, with limitations in deployment mechanisms and potential for unwanted motion during expansion.

Innovation Solution

An expanding implant with hinged arms utilizing a threaded bolt actuator, asymmetric actuator linkages, and a bridging element engaged via double pin-in-slot mechanism to ensure controlled and amplified motion, limiting unwanted sliding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a threaded bolt actuator with asymmetric actuator linkages is used, then deployment precision and control are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into modular components including the base, hinged arms, bridging element, and actuator system with threaded bolt and linkages. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for precision while maintaining overall system controllability despite increased complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Asymmetric actuator linkages are employed to achieve precise control over the expansion motion of the hinged arms. The asymmetric configuration allows for controlled amplification of motion in specific directions, improving deployment precision while the complexity is managed through the functional necessity of the asymmetric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid bridging element with double pin-in-slot engagement is used, then stability during expansion is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability during expansionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The double pin-in-slot engagement mechanism is pre-configured in the rigid bridging element to automatically constrain and guide the expansion motion of the hinged arms. This preliminary arrangement ensures stability during expansion without requiring active control during the deployment process, managing complexity through passive mechanical guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid bridging element with double pin-in-slot engagement acts as an intermediary component that mediates the expansion motion between the hinged arms and the actuator system. It provides stable guidance and constraint while transferring motion, improving stability during expansion while the complexity is justified by the mediating function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the implant is designed for minimally invasive insertion in collapsed form, then ease of insertion is improved, but deployment control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of insertionVSAvoiddeployment control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is designed to collapse into a compact configuration that can be nested within a delivery system for minimally invasive insertion. The hinged arms and bridging element are arranged to fold or compress together, allowing easy insertion through small incisions while the nested structure is later deployed using the threaded bolt actuator system to achieve controlled expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The implant transitions from a static collapsed state for insertion to a dynamic expanded state for function. The hinged arms and actuator system enable controlled transformation between these states, improving ease of insertion while the dynamic deployment mechanism manages the complexity of controlled expansion after insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and controlled expansion of orthopedic implants, enhancing deployment efficiency and stability during minimally invasive surgeries, particularly in spinal applications.

Implementation Method 1

the actuator comprises: (a) a threaded bolt extending within the base and mounted so as to be rotatable about a central axis of the threaded bolt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS12514715B2Expanding implant with hinged arms
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 SEASPINE ORTHOPEDICS CORP
  • US12514715B2 patent drawing
  • US12514715B2 patent drawing
  • US12514715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An implant (500, 600) includes first and second arms (14a, 14b) hinged to a base (12) at spaced-apart locations. An actuator (18, 22a, 22b, 602, 604, 606) is deployed to rotate the arms from an initial position in opposing angular motion towards a final position. A rigid bridging element (28) bridges between the arms so that deployment of the arms towards the final position displaces the bridging element away from the base. Engagement between the bridging element and at least one of the arms is via a double pin-in-slot engagement in which two non-collinear pins (30, 40) are engaged in respective non-parallel slots (32, 42).