Hinged Bag Dispenser Rack for Multi-Size Counter Space Saving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bag dispensing systems for retail counters are inefficient in utilizing space, often requiring large areas and not accommodating multiple bag sizes, nor providing easy loading or visual inventory, while also lacking durability and simplicity for operation.

Innovation Solution

A modular bag dispenser system with adjustable trays and hinged cover plates that can hold multiple bag sizes, allowing for efficient use of counter space, easy loading, and visual inventory, while being durable and inexpensive, and capable of accommodating advertising.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a traditional bag dispensing system is used, then bags can be dispensed, but it requires a large amount of counter space (one square foot or more)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounter spaceVSAvoidbag size accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The dispensing system is divided into multiple compartments, each capable of holding different sizes of bags. This segmentation allows the system to accommodate various bag sizes simultaneously while maintaining a compact overall footprint, resolving the contradiction between space efficiency and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Smaller compartments are nested within or alongside larger ones, allowing multiple bag sizes to be stored in a hierarchical arrangement. This nesting approach maximizes the use of vertical and horizontal space, enabling the dispenser to hold multiple bag sizes without requiring excessive counter space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If a traditional bag dispensing system is used, then bags can be dispensed, but loading and inventory management are complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and inventory managementVSAvoidtime for loading and inventory
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Bags are pre-packaged in compact bundles with built-in tearing features and alignment structures. These preliminary preparations allow for rapid loading into the dispenser compartments and enable quick visual inventory checks, significantly reducing the time and complexity of loading and management operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The bag bundles are designed with self-aligning features and easy-tear mechanisms that allow the system to automatically organize and dispense bags without requiring complex manual intervention. This self-service approach simplifies loading procedures and enables quick inventory assessment by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Area of stationary object

If a compact bag dispenser is used, then counter space is saved, but it may not accommodate multiple bag sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounter spaceVSAvoidmultiple bag sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The dispenser is divided into multiple size-specific compartments, each optimized for different bag dimensions. This segmentation enables the compact unit to accommodate various bag sizes simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between compactness and multi-size capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dispenser features adjustable or reconfigurable compartments that can adapt to different bag sizes. This dynamic adjustability allows the same compact unit to serve multiple bag size requirements, maintaining versatility while preserving space efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a durable and functional bag dispenser is used, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability and functionalityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The dispenser is constructed primarily from uniform plastic material using injection molding techniques. This homogeneous material selection and consistent manufacturing process enhance durability while keeping production costs low and manufacturing complexity minimal, resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Data Source

PatentUS8567618B2Bag dispenser rack
Publication Date: 2013.10.29 TAN DANIEL BRIAN
  • US8567618B2 patent drawing
  • US8567618B2 patent drawing
  • US8567618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bag dispenser rack, includes a first bag pack support tray that has a first base, a first left side wall, a first right side wall, a first back wall, a first front wall and holds a first merchandise bag pack. The first front wall has a first opening that permits extraction of first bags from the first pack. A second bag pack support tray has a second base, a second left side wall, a second right side wall, a second back wall, a second front wall and holds a second merchandise bag pack. The second front wall has a second opening to permit extraction of second bags from the second pack. The second bag pack support tray is hingedly attached to the first bag pack support tray. The second bag pack support tray pivots upwardly to permit loading of a first bag pack into the first bag pack tray.