Hinged Cross Beam Mounting for Weaving Machine Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Weaving machines experience vibrations and reduced component lifespan due to cyclic loads and deformations of lateral frames, which affect the quality of the woven product and efficiency of the weaving process, particularly at high operating speeds and loads.

Innovation Solution

The cross beam is hingedly connected to an attachment element with a hinge pin aligned along its axis of inertia, and optionally features a connecting element with an attenuating device like a spring or cylinder, or is mounted with a ball-and-socket joint to allow for relative movement and absorb deformations, reducing the transmission of vibrations to the cross beam.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If cross beams are rigidly connected to lateral frames, then structural strength is improved, but vibrations and deformations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidvibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by replacing rigid fixed connections with hinge connections that allow controlled movement. The hinge connection enables the cross beam to rotate relative to the lateral frame, absorbing vibrations and deformations dynamically rather than transmitting them rigidly, thus maintaining structural strength while reducing harmful vibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge connection acts as an intermediary element between the lateral frame and the cross beam. It mediates the force transmission by allowing rotational movement, thereby decoupling the vibration sources from the cross beam while still providing structural support, thus resolving the contradiction between strength and vibration reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If lateral frames are made stronger to reduce deformations, then stability is improved, but machine size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidmachine size
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing the size and complexity of lateral frames to reduce deformations, the patent uses dynamic hinge connections that allow the structure to adapt to loads. The hinge enables controlled deformation absorption without requiring larger or more complex frame structures, maintaining stability while avoiding increased machine size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If hinge pin is aligned along axis of inertia, then vibration transmission is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration transmissionVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the hinge pin orientation to align with the axis of inertia of the cross beam. This specific geometric parameter alignment minimizes vibration transmission by ensuring that the hinge rotation occurs along the principal axis, reducing unwanted lateral vibrations. The manufacturing precision requirement is a practical consideration for achieving this optimal parameter alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design minimizes the deformation and vibration of the cross beam, thereby reducing material loss and improving the quality and stability of the woven product while extending the service life of machine components without increasing the machine's size or cost.

Implementation Method 1

at least one lateral frame of the weaving machine comprises at least one attachment element which is hingedly connected to the cross beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Implementation Method 2

a connecting element with an attenuating device like a spring or cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration attenuation: Damping

Implementation Method 3

an attenuating device like a spring or cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring elasticity: Spring

Implementation Method 4

an attenuating device like a spring or cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 5

mounted with a ball-and-socket joint to allow for relative movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpherical joint mechanism: Ball

Data Source

PatentEP2017379B1Mounting of cross beams in a weaving machine
Publication Date: 2010.06.30 NV MICHEL VAN DE WIELE
  • EP2017379B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2017379B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2017379B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a weaving machine comprising at least one cross beam (2) which is carried and/or supported by at least two lateral frames (1) of the weaving machine, in which the relative movement of the cross beam (2) with respect to the lateral frames (1) has at least one degree of freedom as a result of deformations of the lateral frames (1), as a result of which the deformations of the cross beam arc smaller than the deformations of the lateral frame (1) on the connection surface with the cross beam. The claimed degree of freedom allows one or more lateral frames (1) to deform, without the cross beam (2) having to follow the entire deformation. This means that the cross beam (2) of the weaving machine according to the present invention will deform and vibrate to a lesser degree than in known weaving machines.