Relative Orientation Sensing in Hinged Computing Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computing devices with multiple portions connected by a hinge face challenges in accurately sensing relative orientations beyond the open/closed state, particularly when accelerometers in each portion are oriented such that the gravity vector does not change, leading to difficulties in distinguishing rotational movements.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a first and second three-dimensional orientation sensor system in each portion of the computing device, allowing the device to determine relative orientations through data received from these sensors and adjust functions accordingly, such as display outputs and power consumption, by using quaternions or Euler angles to calculate the relative angle and orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If accelerometers are used in each portion to sense orientation, then power consumption is reduced and device complexity is lowered, but measurement precision deteriorates when the gravity vector does not change during rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidorientation sensing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor types (accelerometers, gyroscopes, and optionally magnetometers) into an integrated orientation sensing system. This merging allows the system to leverage the low power consumption of accelerometers for static orientation detection while using gyroscopes to maintain measurement precision during dynamic movements when the gravity vector doesn't change, thus resolving the contradiction between power efficiency and measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the operational parameters of different sensors based on device state. Accelerometers are activated when static orientation detection suffices (low power mode), while gyroscopes are engaged during detected motion or when high precision is required (high precision mode). This parameter switching resolves the contradiction by adapting the sensing approach to actual operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If accelerometers are oriented such that the gravity vector does not change during rotation, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to distinguish rotational movements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor orientation complexityVSAvoidrotational movement information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The gyroscope acts as an intermediary sensor that compensates for the limitation of accelerometers in detecting rotational movements. While accelerometers with fixed orientation cannot distinguish rotations that don't change the gravity vector, the gyroscope directly measures angular velocity, providing the missing rotational information without requiring complex reorientation of the accelerometer system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces reliance on mechanical reorientation of accelerometers (changing their physical orientation to detect rotation) with a sensor-based solution using gyroscopes that electronically detect rotational movements through angular velocity measurement. This substitution maintains simple mechanical design while recovering the lost rotational movement information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensor types are combined to improve orientation sensing accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientation sensing precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic sensor management where the combination and activation of sensors adapt based on operational conditions. Not all sensors operate continuously or simultaneously; instead, the system dynamically selects and combines sensor inputs based on device state, motion detection, and precision requirements. This dynamic approach achieves high measurement precision while managing device complexity through intelligent resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from motion detection algorithms and orientation calculations to dynamically adjust sensor activation and data fusion strategies. When high precision is required or motion is detected, the system activates additional sensors and applies more sophisticated fusion algorithms. During static conditions, it relies on simpler accelerometer-only operation. This feedback-driven approach optimizes the balance between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate determination of relative orientations in all possible device positions, enhancing computing device performance by allowing for adjustments in functionality based on the orientation, such as animating display content and optimizing power usage without affecting user experience.

Implementation Method 1

accelerometers in each portion are oriented such that the gravity vector does not change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3759569B1Sensing relative orientation of computing device portions
Publication Date: 2023.01.04 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3759569B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3759569B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3759569B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Examples are disclosed that relate to determining the relative orientation of computing device portions that are rotatable relative to one another. One example provides a computing device comprising a first portion (106) comprising a first three-dimensional orientation sensor system (114), a second portion (108) comprising a second three-dimensional orientation sensor system (116), the second portion being rotatable relative to the first portion, a logic machine, and a storage machine holding instructions executable by the logic machine to receive data from the first three-dimensional orientation sensor system indicating a three-dimensional orientation of the first portion, receive data from the second three-dimensional orientation sensor system indicating a three-dimensional orientation of the second portion, determine a relative orientation between the first portion and the second portion based on the three-dimensional orientation of the first portion and the three-dimensional orientation of the second portion, and adjust a function of the computing device based on the relative orientation.