Hinged Dual-Compartment Package With Snap-Fit Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dual compartment packaging for consumable products like chewing gum lacks a reliable and user-friendly releasable closure mechanism that allows for repeated opening and closing without compromising the package's ability to remain closed under gravitational forces.

Innovation Solution

A package design featuring two product accommodating compartments separated by a hinge, with a releasable closure mechanism such as clips, hook and loop fasteners, magnetic fasteners, pressure sensitive labels, static cling film, or interfitting mechanical devices that align and engage upon folding, allowing for easy opening and closing while maintaining the package in a closed position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a foldable flap closure is used to maintain the package in a closed position, then the package can be repeatedly opened and closed, but the closure mechanism becomes complex and difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of opening and closingVSAvoidclosure mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the closure function from a complex multi-component flap system and implements it through a simple single-component snap-fit mechanism. The closure member is a standalone element that can be easily attached and detached, eliminating the complexity of folded flaps, slots, and tucking mechanisms while maintaining the ability to repeatedly open and close the package.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the closure mechanism from a mechanical folding system to a snap-fit system that relies on elastic deformation and friction. By changing the closure parameter from geometric interlocking (flaps and slots) to force-based engagement (snap-fit with retaining walls and protrusions), the operation becomes significantly simpler while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a simple foldable flap is used for closure, then the device complexity is reduced, but the package cannot reliably remain closed under gravitational forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to remain closedVSAvoidclosure mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The snap-fit closure mechanism is self-locking and automatically maintains the package in a closed position under gravitational forces without requiring additional retaining structures. The elastic deformation of the snap-fit member and the friction between mating surfaces create a self-sustaining closed state that reliably prevents the package from opening unless deliberately actuated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical folding and tucking system with a snap-fit mechanism that uses elastic deformation and friction forces. This substitution provides more reliable closure under gravity while actually reducing the number of mechanical components required, as the snap-fit member integrates multiple functions into a single element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple closure mechanisms are added to improve reliability, then the package remains closed more securely, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure securityVSAvoidease of opening and closing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the closure security function with ease of operation by integrating the retaining walls, protrusions, and snap-fit member into a unified mechanism. The single snap-fit member simultaneously provides secure engagement through the retaining walls and easy operation through its flexible, snapable design, eliminating the need for multiple separate closure mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables a secure, easy-to-open-and-close package that remains closed under normal conditions, allowing for repeated use and providing consumer convenience with options for noiseless or audible closure, depending on the chosen mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic fasteners

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

mating hook and loop fasteners

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2632810B1Releasably closable product accommodating package
Publication Date: 2015.08.12 INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC
  • EP2632810B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2632810B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2632810B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A releasable closure provides for the opening and closing of a package assembly which accommodates a plurality of elongate consumable products. The assembly includes a package housing for supporting the products. The package housing includes a first product accommodating compartment and a second product accommodating compartment separated by a hinge. Each of the product accommodating compartments has an open end adjacent the hinge. The product accommodating compartments are foldable about the hinge in a book-like fashion. The releasable closure is applied to each compartment and positioned to be in aligned facing relationship for mutual engagement upon closably folding the compartments about the hinge.