Hinged Elevator Shaft Safety Gate for Reusable Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing construction safety measures, such as wooden barriers, are semi-permanent, difficult to install and remove, lead to waste, require frequent inspections, and lack structural rigidity, posing risks and inefficiencies in protecting exposed elevator shafts during construction.

Innovation Solution

A safety gate system with hinged gate panels and central lock inserts, allowing easy opening and closing, providing structural rigidity, and featuring components like column inserts, support rods, and gate latches for customizable and reusable protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wooden boards are fastened directly to concrete walls to create temporary barriers, then protection against falling into elevator shafts is provided, but the barriers become semi-permanent and difficult to open or remove

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidaccessibility to shaft
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is divided into multiple hinged panels that can be independently opened. The gate panel is segmented into a first panel and second panel connected by a hinge, allowing the first panel to be opened while the second panel remains closed, providing selective access while maintaining protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier transitions from a static wooden board to a dynamic hinged gate system. The gate panel can pivot between open and closed positions, and the hinge mechanism allows for easy opening and closing operations, making the barrier adaptable to different access requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If wooden boards are removed after use, then access to the shaft is enabled, but the boards must be re-installed to maintain protection, creating waste and inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to shaftVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The safety gate system is designed to be reusable across multiple locations and projects. The standardized gate assembly with columns, panels, and locking mechanisms can be disassembled and reinstalled elsewhere, serving multiple functions and locations rather than being single-use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding wooden boards after removal, the system recovers and reuses the gate components. The modular design allows for easy disassembly and reuse of columns, panels, and locking mechanisms in subsequent installations, reducing material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of manufacture

If wooden boards are used as temporary barriers, then installation is simple, but they lack structural rigidity for additional purposes beyond temporary protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidstructural rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple materials and components to achieve both ease of installation and structural rigidity. It integrates metal columns, rigid gate panels, hinge mechanisms, and locking systems into a composite structure that is both strong and relatively easy to assemble.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional components are merged into a single integrated system. The columns, gate panels, hinges, and locking mechanisms work together as a unified structure, providing both the simplicity of a pre-assembled unit and the structural strength of multiple reinforced components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If wooden boards require daily physical inspection by trained personnel, then safety is monitored, but time-consuming inspection creates waste from both timing and cost perspectives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed with clear visual indicators that allow personnel to quickly assess the gate's status without extensive inspection. The mechanical locking system provides self-evident feedback on whether the gate is properly secured, reducing the need for time-consuming detailed inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12366110B2Safety gate
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 WATERFILLED BARRIER SYST INT INC
  • US12366110B2 patent drawing
  • US12366110B2 patent drawing
  • US12366110B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety gate includes a first column, disposed on a first side of an elevator shaft, a second column, disposed on a second side of the elevator shaft, a first gate panel, and a second gate panel. The first gate panel is coupled to the first column via a first locking hinge. The second gate panel is coupled to the second column via a second locking hinge.