Hinged Container Flap Locking Tab Over-Rotation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container designs with opening flaps often suffer from leakage, unpredictable opening, and over-rotation issues, particularly when subjected to force or weight, leading to insecure closure and potential contents loss.

Innovation Solution

A container design featuring a top panel with a hinge, an opening flap connected to the hinge, and a locking tab mechanism that engages with a free end portion seat to prevent over-rotation and ensure secure closure, characterized by a nonoverlapping relationship between the opening flap edges and the top panel, allowing for controlled separation and deformation to facilitate locking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the opening flap is made to tightly seal to the container using a wedge seal, then the sealing performance is improved, but the opening flap becomes difficult to open

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidease to open
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The opening flap is segmented into a first portion and a second portion that can move relative to each other. The first portion maintains the seal with the container body, while the second portion can be lifted independently to open the container. This segmentation allows the seal to remain tight while enabling easy opening by lifting only the second portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The opening flap transitions from a static, rigid structure to a dynamic, multi-position structure. The flap can exist in a closed sealed position, an intermediate partially open position, and a fully open position. This dynamic capability allows the flap to maintain sealing when closed while enabling easy access when opened.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If the opening flap is designed as a partial cutout with through cut, then the manufacturing complexity is reduced and access is improved, but the opening flap becomes prone to over-rotation and pushing into the container interior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidflap position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The opening flap is divided into a first portion attached to the container body and a second portion that can move independently. The second portion includes a free end that can be lifted to open the container without the entire flap rotating uncontrollably. This segmentation provides stability while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the opening flap have different properties: the first portion is fixed and provides structural stability, while the second portion is movable and provides controlled opening functionality. This local differentiation allows the flap to resist over-rotation while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the opening flap is tucked closed into the inner periphery of the container, then the closing force is improved, but the opening flap becomes leaky and unpredictably pops open

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidclosure reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The opening flap is segmented into a first portion that provides closing force by engaging with the container body, and a second portion that maintains a controlled relationship with the first portion. This segmentation allows the flap to apply sufficient closing force while preventing unpredictable popping open through the controlled movement capability of the second portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If the opening flap edges overlap with the top panel, then the structural integrity is improved, but the locking mechanism cannot engage properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidlocking engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The opening flap is divided into a first portion that overlaps with the top panel to provide structural integrity, and a second portion that includes the free end capable of lifting to engage the locking mechanism. This segmentation allows both overlapping for strength and proper locking engagement to coexist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3566963B1Container with hinged opening flap and locking tab
Publication Date: 2020.12.30 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • EP3566963B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3566963B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3566963B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A container having a hinged opening flap having free end portion. The free end portion comes into facing relationship with a free end portion seat. One or more locking tabs connected to the opening flap or the free end portion seat edge are provided. The locking tabs can lock the opening flap into a closed position. The container can be erected from a blank.