Hinged Flight Control Surface Structural Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design and testing of actuation systems for aircraft flight control surfaces are complex and computationally intensive, requiring time-consuming and expensive finite element models and physical test rigs, which can be inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A structural model representing a hinged flight control surface system with actuation branches, a massless connector, and a load mass, allowing for efficient modeling and simulation of dynamic behavior, which can also serve as a specification for fabricating a physical test rig.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If finite element models are used for modeling actuation systems, then modeling accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex finite element model into a simplified structural model with discrete components (actuation branches, massless connector, load mass) that captures essential dynamics without requiring full finite element complexity. This segmentation maintains sufficient accuracy for system identification while dramatically reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the critical dynamic characteristics from the full finite element model, creating a reduced-order structural model that focuses on the essential mass, stiffness, and damping properties needed for control system design and analysis, eliminating unnecessary computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If finite element models are used for modeling actuation systems, then modeling accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the modeling approach into a simplified structural model with explicit mass, stiffness, and damping matrices, the patent eliminates the time-consuming mesh generation and solution processes of full finite element analysis, achieving rapid model development and simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from detailed finite element parameters (mesh density, element types) to aggregated structural parameters (equivalent mass, stiffness, damping) that can be determined analytically or through simple testing, dramatically reducing the time required for model creation and modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If physical test rigs are developed for testing actuation systems, then testing accuracy is improved, but development cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidtest rig complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified structural model that serves as a virtual copy of the actuation system, capturing essential dynamic behavior without requiring a full-scale physical replica. This virtual model can be used for initial design validation and system identification before physical testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter identification techniques to determine equivalent mass, stiffness, and damping values from limited physical tests or operational data, allowing the simplified structural model to accurately represent the physical system without requiring a complex physical test rig.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11526636B2Modeling and testing of hinged flight control surfaces of aircraft
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 BOMBARDIER INC
  • US11526636B2 patent drawing
  • US11526636B2 patent drawing
  • US11526636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems relating to the design and testing of systems that include hinged flight control surfaces of aircraft are disclosed. The systems and methods disclosed herein make use of a structural model representing a structural environment of the system in a relatively simple manner. In various embodiments, the structural model comprises one or more actuation branches having a common linear actuation direction, a load mass, and a massless connector representative of a hinge line of the flight control surface. The massless connector is connected to and disposed between the one or more actuation branches and the load mass and is movable along the common linear actuation direction so that linear movement of the massless connector is correlated to rotational movement of the hinged flight control surface.