Hinged Modular Level Bodies for Corner and Angle Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional carpenter levels are unable to level around corners or between adjoining walls or from one portion of a roof to another, limiting their functionality.

Innovation Solution

A modular level multitool with hinged level bodies that allow angular adjustment and locking at specific angles, featuring slotted hinge inserts, quick disconnect tabs, and a lock-in positioner mechanism for flexible use and increased straight line length, made from lightweight materials like aluminum or plastic, with integrated rules, magnets, and optional tool mounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional carpenter levels are used, then the device is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot level around corners or between adjoining walls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to level around cornersVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The level is divided into multiple separate level bodies (first level body, second level body, third level body) that can be independently positioned and connected. Each level body contains its own level vial, allowing them to function independently or in combination to level around corners and between adjoining walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The level bodies are designed to nest within each other when not in use, with smaller level bodies fitting inside larger ones. This nesting arrangement reduces storage space requirements while maintaining the ability to deploy multiple level bodies for corner leveling applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple level bodies are connected with hinges, then the level can articulate at different angles for versatile positioning, but the device becomes more complex and harder to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular adjustment capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The hinges connect the level bodies in a dynamic configuration that allows them to articulate relative to each other. The hinges enable the level bodies to be positioned at various angles while maintaining stable connections, providing dynamic adaptability for different leveling scenarios including corner and ceiling applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge system is implemented as a separate connecting component rather than being integrated into the level bodies themselves. This segmentation allows the hinges to be manufactured independently and attached to standard level bodies, simplifying the overall manufacturing process while still enabling angular adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of moving object

If the level bodies are made from lightweight materials, then the tool is easier to handle and transport, but the structural strength may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of level toolVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The level bodies are constructed from composite materials that combine lightweight properties with adequate structural strength. This allows the multi-body level to be easily handled and transported while maintaining the structural integrity needed to support the level vials and withstand normal usage conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise leveling around corners and between structures, enhancing usability and versatility on job sites by allowing multiple users to quickly assemble and disassemble the tool, and accommodating various angles and tools for comprehensive leveling tasks.

Implementation Method 1

each hinge insert comprises a quick disconnect tab, preferably spring-loaded, that is received in an opening in the level body in which it is installed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring mechanism: Spring

Implementation Method 2

each hinge comprises a lock-in positioner mechanism to releasably lock the level bodies connected via each respective hinge in one or more discreet angles between two respective level bodies connected via each hinge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

each hinge comprises two slotted hinge inserts defining slots and openings fastened together by hinge bars, also defining openings, disposed in the slots and bolts inserted in the respective openings in the hinge inserts and hinge bars

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Implementation Method 4

one or more sides of one or more of the plurality of level bodies has a magnet affixed thereon or built therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11092439B2Level multitool
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 WORYK JOSEPH EDWARD
  • US11092439B2 patent drawing
  • US11092439B2 patent drawing
  • US11092439B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A level multitool, comprising a plurality level bodies, wherein each of the plurality of level bodies comprises at least one level, bubble level or spirit level and wherein each of the plurality of level bodies is removably connected to another of the plurality of level bodies by a hinge such that a first level body connected by a first hinge can articulate with respect to a second level body connected thereto via the first hinge so that the first and second level bodies may be releasably locked by the first hinge in a plurality of positions wherein an angle between the first and second level bodies at each position is different than the angle therebetween at each of the other plurality of positions.