Hinged Spinal Implant for Controlled Bone Growth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal stabilization devices post-laminoplasty procedures face challenges in controlling bone regrowth direction, which can lead to increased pressure on the spinal cord and reduced procedure efficacy, and they often require wedges or spacers that may not provide adequate stabilization without causing further complications.

Innovation Solution

The development of spinal implants with hingedly connected fixation sections and a spacer section that can be inserted between bone structures, allowing for controlled bone growth and stabilization without the need for a wedge or spacer, utilizing materials like titanium and polymers to promote fusion and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spinal stabilization devices are used post-laminoplasty, then spinal stabilization is achieved, but bone regrowth direction cannot be controlled leading to increased pressure on the spinal cord

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilizationVSAvoiduncontrolled bone regrowth pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into multiple sections: first fixation section, second fixation section, and spacer section. Each section serves a specific function - the fixation sections anchor to bone structures while the spacer section controls the gap and directs bone regrowth, thereby achieving reliable stabilization without uncontrolled bone pressure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spacer section acts as an intermediary element between the first and second fixation sections. It maintains a controlled gap that guides bone regrowth in a specific direction, preventing uncontrolled bone growth from pressing on the spinal cord while still providing structural support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Shape

If wedges or spacers are used for stabilization, then spinal alignment is improved, but complications increase due to inadequate stabilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal alignmentVSAvoidstabilization adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the functions of traditional wedges/spacers with fixation mechanisms into a single integrated implant. The fixation sections with bone anchors provide reliable stabilization while the spacer section maintains proper alignment, eliminating the need for separate wedge or spacer components and reducing complications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If rigid fixation is used to ensure stabilization, then spinal stability is improved, but flexibility and adjustability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilityVSAvoidflexibility and adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The implant incorporates dynamic characteristics through its hinged connections between sections. The hinge allows controlled movement and adjustment during the healing process, providing flexibility and adaptability. As bone regrowth occurs, the structure transitions to a more rigid configuration, ensuring long-term stability while maintaining short-term adjustability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11903619B2Orthopedic stabilization devices and methods for installation thereof
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US11903619B2 patent drawing
  • US11903619B2 patent drawing
  • US11903619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments herein are generally directed to spinal implants for use in orthopedic stabilization assemblies. In some embodiments, these implants may be used in conjunction with laminoplasty or laminectomy procedures.