Hint-Based Machine Learning Model for Medical Image Annotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for annotating data for machine learning models, particularly in image processing, are time-consuming and prone to bias, with annotators facing challenges in accurately marking specific tissues or cells due to the lack of standardization, leading to fatigue and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A hint-based machine learning system that receives initial annotation information from annotators, uses this information to infer annotation data, and then refines the output through iterative correction, improving accuracy and reducing annotator workload by leveraging hint information to encode and expand regions within the data for better annotation inference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If annotators manually mark regions in target data to indicate specific tissues or cells, then annotation accuracy can be achieved, but the work becomes time-consuming and causes annotator fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated inference to generate initial annotation results before annotators perform manual marking. This preliminary action provides a head start, reducing the time annotators need to spend on each image while maintaining accuracy through subsequent manual refinement of the pre-generated annotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An artificial neural network model acts as an intermediary between the target data and the final annotation. The model generates initial annotation predictions that serve as a bridge, reducing the gap between raw data and completed annotations, thereby decreasing annotator workload and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If annotators manually mark regions in target data, then annotation information can be obtained, but consistency becomes difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidannotation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where the artificial neural network model generates initial annotations, annotators refine these predictions, and the corrected annotations are used to re-train and improve the model. This continuous feedback ensures consistency across annotations while maintaining high accuracy through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the annotation process by shifting from purely manual marking to a hybrid approach combining automated model predictions with human refinement. This parameter change in the annotation workflow maintains consistency through standardized model behavior while preserving accuracy through human oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the artificial neural network infers annotation results first and then annotators confirm or modify them, then annotator workload is reduced, but bias is introduced to the inference results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation efficiencyVSAvoidannotation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system inverts the traditional workflow by having annotators provide hint information first (such as key regions or important features), and then the artificial neural network generates the complete annotation based on these hints. This inversion reduces bias because annotators guide the model rather than merely confirming pre-generated results, maintaining both efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Measurement precision

If hint information is received from annotators and used to train the machine learning model, then annotation accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system embeds the hint information processing within the existing machine learning framework. The hints from annotators are nested as additional input features or loss function components within the standard neural network architecture, improving accuracy without requiring a completely separate complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS20220092448A1Method and system for providing annotation information for target data through hint-based machine learning model
Publication Date: 2022.03.24 LUNIT
  • US20220092448A1 patent drawing
  • US20220092448A1 patent drawing
  • US20220092448A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for training a hint-based machine learning model configured to infer annotation information for target data, including obtaining training data for the machine learning model, wherein the training data includes a plurality of target data items provided with a plurality of annotation information items, and extracting a plurality of pixel groups from the plurality of target data items. The extracted plurality of pixel groups may be included in hint information. In addition, the method includes obtaining, from the plurality of annotation information items, a plurality of annotation classes corresponding to the extracted plurality of pixel groups to include the obtained plurality of annotation classes in the hint information, and training, by using the hint information, the machine learning model to infer the plurality of annotation information items associated with the plurality of target data items.