Personalized Hip Implant Design via Virtual Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical treatments for hip dysplasia, such as the shelf procedure and pelvic osteotomy, are invasive and lack precision, leading to potential impingements and reduced freedom of movement due to imperfect acetabular coverage and bone modifications.

Innovation Solution

A method for manufacturing personalized bone implants using data sets of patient bones, creating models, simulating movements, and modifying the implant design to avoid impingements, ensuring precise fit and minimizing bone modifications, with the option of three-dimensional printing using biofunctional materials like titanium and magnesium.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional surgical treatments like shelf procedure or pelvic osteotomy are used to treat hip dysplasia, then acetabular coverage can be improved, but the invasiveness of the procedure increases and precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacetabular coverageVSAvoidinvasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant design is performed in advance using virtual planning and movement simulation before the actual surgery. The implant is customized based on pre-operative imaging data (CT or MRI) and simulated to ensure it will not impinge on bone movements. This preliminary digital planning and customization allows for precise, minimally invasive surgery by eliminating the need for extensive intraoperative bone modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional surgical treatments are used to increase acetabular coverage, then coverage is improved, but impingement of joint movement may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacetabular coverageVSAvoidfreedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Movement simulation is performed using the patient's specific anatomical data and defined range of motion parameters. The simulation provides feedback on whether the proposed implant design would cause impingement or restrict joint movement. Based on this feedback, the implant design is optimized to achieve adequate acetabular coverage while maintaining full freedom of movement, eliminating the need for trial-and-error surgical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If precise implant fitting is achieved through traditional methods, then bone modification is minimized, but precision is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone preservationVSAvoidimplant fit precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The implant design parameters are customized based on the patient's specific anatomical measurements derived from imaging data. The implant geometry, size, and position are optimized using virtual planning software to achieve precise fit with the patient's unique bone structure. This parameter customization allows for high-precision implant placement that conforms exactly to the patient's anatomy, minimizing bone modification while achieving optimal fit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11622862B2Implant, fitting plate and method of manufacturing an implant and fitting plate
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 UMC UTRECHT HLDG BV
  • US11622862B2 patent drawing
  • US11622862B2 patent drawing
  • US11622862B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An implant, a fitting plate suitable for placing of an implant, and a method for manufacturing an implant suitable for application on one or more bones.