Hip-to-Side Silhouette Sizing for Adult Absorbent Articles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current adult absorbent articles fail to adequately fit a broad range of body shapes and sizes, leading to issues with leakage, comfort, and discretion, as they are often designed based solely on waist circumference without considering Hip-to-Side Silhouette ratios, which vary significantly across different body types and BMI ranges.

Innovation Solution

The development of disposable absorbent articles with varying sizes and designs that match the Hip-to-Side Silhouette ratios of different body types, including arrays with multiple sizes that adjust Relaxed Product Side Length and Hip Width to better conform to individual body shapes, thereby improving fit, comfort, and gasketing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If absorbent articles are designed to fit a broad range of body sizes using only waist circumference sizing, then the product can be manufactured with simpler sizing parameters, but the fit, gasketing, and discretion are compromised due to inadequate consideration of hip-to-side silhouette variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit across body typesVSAvoidsizing parameter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new sizing parameter (hip-to-side silhouette ratio) in addition to waist circumference to better characterize body shapes. This allows the absorbent article dimensions to be adjusted based on multiple body measurement parameters, improving fit across different body types while maintaining a systematic approach to sizing that doesn't overly complicate manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the absorbent article into different dimensional parameters (waist circumference, hip width, side length) that can be independently adjusted based on the wearer's body measurements. This segmentation allows each dimension to be optimized for specific body shapes, improving overall fit without requiring a completely complex redesign of the entire product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Length of stationary object

If the product Relaxed Side Length is made excessive to accommodate larger body sizes, then coverage is improved for larger individuals, but material shows above the top of clothing and waist edge placement becomes improper for smaller individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRelaxed Side LengthVSAvoidproper placement
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different side length specifications for different size categories within the product array. Smaller sizes have shorter side lengths appropriate for smaller body frames, while larger sizes have longer side lengths for larger bodies. This local differentiation ensures that each individual receives the appropriate side length for their body type, preventing material showing for smaller individuals while maintaining adequate coverage for larger individuals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the product Relaxed Side Length is made too short to avoid material showing, then discretion is improved, but coverage is insufficient and gapping occurs for individuals with larger body sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovediscretionVSAvoidcoverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent varies the Relaxed Side Length parameter across different size categories in the product array, with longer side lengths for larger sizes and shorter side lengths for smaller sizes. This parameter differentiation ensures that each size provides adequate coverage and prevents gapping for its target body type while maintaining discretion by avoiding excessive material showing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If current marketed products are designed to fit increments as large as 100 pounds, then manufacturing and inventory complexity is reduced, but adequate fit, gasketing, comfort and discretion cannot be provided across the entire range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct array structureVSAvoidfit precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the product array into multiple size categories with smaller weight range increments (e.g., 20-40 pound ranges) rather than large 100-pound increments. This segmentation allows each size to be more precisely tailored to specific body types, improving fit and gasketing precision while maintaining a manageable product array structure that is feasible for manufacturing and inventory management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11883269B2Hip-to-side silhouettes of adult disposable absorbent articles and arrays
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US11883269B2 patent drawing
  • US11883269B2 patent drawing
  • US11883269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, an array of packages may comprise two or more different sizes of disposable absorbent articles. The Product Hip-to-Side Silhouette of a second absorbent article may be equal to or greater than a Product Hip-to-Side Silhouette of a first absorbent article. And, an Array Average Product Hip-to-Side Silhouette of first and second packages of the array may be from about 2.2 to about 6.0.