Hip Joint Stem Surface Roughness Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificial hip joint stems face challenges with poor insertability and risk of premature fixation to the femoral bone, leading to issues like thigh pain and stress shielding due to increased surface roughness for bonding, which complicates stem insertion and bone integration.

Innovation Solution

The artificial hip joint stem is designed with a proximal rough surface (Ra 10-80 µm), an intermediate smooth satin surface (Ra 0.1-1.0 µm), and a distal shiny surface (Ra < 0.1 µm) to enhance insertability and prevent fixation, reducing friction and bone ongrowth, while maintaining fixability at the proximal part.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the surface roughness (Ra) of the stem is increased to improve bonding strength between the stem and the bone, then the bonding strength is improved, but the friction against the bone increases, resulting in poor insertability of the stem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strength between stem and boneVSAvoidinsertability of the stem
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stem surface is divided into three distinct regions with different roughness characteristics: proximal rough surface (Ra 10-80 μm) for bone bonding, intermediate smooth satin surface (Ra 0.1-1.0 μm) for reduced friction during insertion, and distal shiny surface (Ra < 0.1 μm) for preventing premature fixation. This local differentiation allows each region to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the surface roughness (Ra) of the stem is increased to improve bonding strength, then bone ongrowth occurs on the surface of the stem, but the distal part of the stem becomes apt to be fixed to the femoral bone, causing thigh pain and stress shielding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strength between stem and boneVSAvoidthigh pain and stress shielding
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different surface roughness zones are applied to different anatomical regions of the stem: the proximal rough surface promotes bone ongrowth where fixation is desired, while the distal shiny surface prevents bone ongrowth where fixation would cause harm. This spatial differentiation of surface properties eliminates the harmful effects of premature distal fixation while maintaining beneficial proximal bone integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The stem surface is segmented into three distinct roughness zones along its length, allowing independent control of bone interaction characteristics at each segment. This segmentation enables the proximal segment to provide stable fixation through bone ongrowth while the distal segment remains free of harmful fixation, thus preventing thigh pain and stress shielding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the surface roughness (Ra) is increased to roughen the surface of the stem, then bonding strength between the stem and the bone is improved, but the distal part of the stem contacts with soft tissue and cancellous bone, resulting in poor insertability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strength between stem and boneVSAvoidinsertability of the stem
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stem surface is differentiated into three roughness zones: proximal rough surface (Ra 10-80 μm) for bone bonding, intermediate smooth satin surface (Ra 0.1-1.0 μm) for facilitating insertion by reducing friction, and distal shiny surface (Ra < 0.1 μm) for preventing soft tissue and cancellous bone contact. This local quality differentiation allows the intermediate and distal regions to provide smooth insertion while the proximal region maintains strong bone bonding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves stem insertability, reduces the risk of premature fixation and associated pain and stress shielding, while facilitating bone integration and rotary resistance, making it suitable for bone preservation type stems.

Implementation Method 1

an increase in the surface roughness (Ra) of the stem increases friction against the bone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a smooth satin surface located at the stem intermediate part and having a surface roughness (Ra) of 0.1-1.0 μm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

a shiny surface located at the stem distal part and having a surface roughness (Ra) of less than 0.1 μm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3095418B1Stem for artificial hip joint, and artificial hip joint provided with same
Publication Date: 2019.02.20 KYOCERA CORP
  • EP3095418B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3095418B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3095418B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(b)

AI summary

An artificial hip joint stem of the present invention includes a stem body divided into a stem proximal part, a stem distal part, and a stem intermediate part located between the stem proximal part and the stem distal part. The stem body includes a rough surface located at the stem proximal part and having a surface roughness (Ra) of 10-80 µm, a smooth satin surface located at the stem intermediate part and having a surface roughness (Ra) of 0.1-1.0 µm, and a shiny surface located at the stem distal part and having a surface roughness (Ra) of less than 0.1 µm. The present invention also provides an artificial hip joint including the artificial hip joint stem.