Histology Embedding Workstation With Real-Time Cassette Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing histological sample embedding processes are manual, leading to low productivity, potential errors, and lack of traceability, with risks of sample misorientation, misidentification, and inconsistent embedding material control.

Innovation Solution

An automated workstation and process that includes a handling device to manage cassettes and moulds, a monitoring system for traceability, and precise control of embedding material dispensing, allowing manual sample orientation and automated handling to ensure accurate embedding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual handling and processing of histological samples is used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but productivity is low and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated workstation is divided into multiple independent modules (sample processing module, embedding module, staining module, etc.), each performing a specific function. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high productivity through automation while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design, where each module can be independently optimized and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The workstation is designed as a universal platform that can handle various histological sample types and processing requirements through programmable control. The system integrates multiple functions (processing, embedding, staining, sectioning) in a single automated workflow, increasing productivity without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then productivity increases and labor intensity decreases, but measurement precision and control accuracy become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where sensors monitor sample position, processing parameters, and quality indicators in real-time. This feedback is fed to the control unit which automatically adjusts processing parameters to maintain measurement precision and control accuracy despite the automated high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated mechanical systems controlled by precision motors and programmable logic. The control unit manages positioning, handling, and processing parameters with high precision through electronic control rather than manual operation, maintaining accuracy while increasing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sample types are handled in a single workflow, then versatility increases, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The workstation features dynamic, programmable control that can adapt workflows based on sample type. The system can automatically adjust processing parameters, module activation sequences, and handling procedures through software control, enabling versatility across multiple sample types without permanently increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed as a universal platform with standardized interfaces and modular components that can be reconfigured for different sample types. The same basic infrastructure handles various histological samples through programmable control, achieving versatility without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If automated embedding processing is used, then consistency and reproducibility improve, but loss of time for setup and calibration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconsistencyVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration and setup operations automatically during initial system initialization or when sample types change. This preliminary action is performed once and stored as parameters, allowing subsequent processing to proceed quickly without repeated manual calibration, thus achieving high consistency while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The workstation is designed to self-calibrate and self-maintain through automated sensors and control systems. The system automatically monitors its own performance and adjusts parameters to maintain consistency, reducing the need for manual intervention and minimizing time loss while ensuring reliable, consistent embedding processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4348217B1Automated workstation, and process, for handling histological samples in the embedding step
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 INPECO
  • EP4348217B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4348217B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP4348217B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An automated workstation for an operator, for embedding histological samples with embedding material (P), comprising a workbench for an operator, defining a working area (W). On one side of the working area (W) of the operator an input area (A) is arranged which receives and accumulates in an automated way cassettes (2) containing histological samples (S). A first handling device (12) picks up cassettes (2) from the input area (A) and feeds them, one at a time, to the working area (W), according to a priority sequence determined in real time as a function of the information associated with the histological samples of the cassettes (2), which are detected on codes indicated on the cassettes. For each new cassette (2) that reaches the working area (W), the operator removes the histological sample (S) from the cassette (2), obtains the dispensing of a first layer of embedding material within a mould (5), by means of a first dispensing device (14), places the histological sample (S), with a selected orientation, within the mould (5) and then applies the cassette (2) over the mould. A transfer device (15) receives, one at a time, from the operator, the moulds (5) containing the oriented histological samples (S). The passage of each new cassette (2) on the transfer device (15) generates a signal which indicates that the working area (W) of the operator is free to receive a new cassette from the input area (A). A second embedding material dispensing device (16) fills each mould (5) and the associated cassette (2) placed thereon, with a volume of embedding material (P). A cooling area (B) arranged downstream of the transfer device (15), receives in an automated way the moulds (5), each one with the respective histological sample covered by the embedding material, in such a way that the embedding material (P) containing each histological sample (S) forms a solidified body (7), in which the histological sample is embedded.