Self-Supervised Histology Feature Extraction for Weakly-Supervised Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning approaches for histopathology rely heavily on strongly-supervised model training with detailed annotations, which are costly and time-consuming, and weakly-supervised methods using frozen feature extractors pre-trained on out-of-domain data like ImageNet, leading to suboptimal performance and GPU memory constraints.

Innovation Solution

Training a feature extractor using self-supervised learning algorithms like Momentum Contrast (MoCo) on in-domain histology tiles without annotations, performing data augmentation, and using contrastive loss to generate semantic tile embeddings, which can then be used for weakly-supervised machine learning models and fine-tuning strongly-supervised models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If strongly-supervised model training with detailed annotations is used, then model performance is improved, but annotation cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-supervised learning by automatically generating training signals from the data itself through data augmentation. The feature extractor learns to produce consistent embeddings for augmented views of the same tile without requiring manual annotations, enabling the model to train itself on large volumes of unannotated histology data while maintaining high performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The feature extractor is pre-trained on large amounts of unannotated data using self-supervised learning before being applied to the specific classification task. This preliminary training on abundant unannotated data prepares the model to achieve strong performance with minimal task-specific annotations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If frozen feature extractors pre-trained on ImageNet are used, then training speed is improved, but performance and domain adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidmodel performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the training regime from frozen pre-trained weights to trainable weights, allowing the feature extractor to adapt its parameters to the histology domain. The model is trained end-to-end with task-specific loss functions, enabling it to learn domain-relevant features while maintaining reasonable training speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The feature extractor undergoes preliminary self-supervised training on histology data before being fine-tuned for the specific classification task. This two-stage approach allows the model to first learn general histology features from unannotated data, then specialize for the target task with minimal annotations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed local annotations are collected from domain experts, then model accuracy is improved, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidannotation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual expert annotation with automated self-supervised learning. The model generates its own training signals by comparing embeddings of augmented views of the same tile, eliminating the need for expensive and complex manual annotations while maintaining high classification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of relying on manual copies of annotated data, the system creates synthetic training examples through data augmentation operations on unannotated data. These augmented copies serve as positive pairs for self-supervised learning, providing abundant training signals without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240020958A1Systems and methods for determining regions of interest in histology images
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 OWKIN FRANCE SAS
  • US20240020958A1 patent drawing
  • US20240020958A1 patent drawing
  • US20240020958A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus is provided for determining one or more regions of interest in an input histology image. Such methods can include receiving an input histology image, and tiling the input histology image into a set of tiles. In various embodiments, the method can also include, for each tile, extracting a feature of that tile by applying a trained feature extractor. The trained feature extractor can be trained with an unsupervised machine learning algorithm using a training set of images. The method can also include clustering the extracted features to assign each of the set of tiles to one of a plurality of regions of interest for each tile, and outputting the plurality of regions of interest.