Historical Data Aggregation With Weighted Source Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to aggregate and reconcile varying accounts of historical data from multiple sources accurately, leading to inefficiencies in data search and retrieval, with irrelevant results often included and relevant information overlooked.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for aggregating data elements associated with subjects, calculating combined scores based on sub-scores and weights, and outputting indications of these scores to create a coherent and usable historical narrative.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If data from multiple sources is aggregated to provide comprehensive historical information, then the completeness and coverage of data improves, but the accuracy and reliability of the aggregated information deteriorates due to varying perspectives and interpretations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidinformation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the aggregated data into individual data elements with distinct provenance tracking. Each data element maintains its source attribution and is evaluated independently, allowing the system to preserve comprehensive data while managing reliability through granular source verification and weighting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification layer that mediates between multiple data sources. This intermediary system evaluates, validates, and reconciles conflicting information from different sources before integration, maintaining data completeness while ensuring accuracy through systematic verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If comprehensive data aggregation is performed to include all historical accounts, then the coverage of information improves, but the efficiency of data retrieval and processing deteriorates due to increased data volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation coverageVSAvoiddata retrieval efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments comprehensive historical data into discrete, structured data elements with standardized metadata. This segmentation enables efficient indexing, querying, and retrieval operations while maintaining complete information coverage, as the segmented structure allows targeted access to specific data elements without processing the entire dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms unstructured historical narratives into structured data elements with standardized parameters and attributes. This parameter transformation enables efficient database operations, filtering, and retrieval while preserving comprehensive information, as structured data can be quickly searched and filtered based on specific criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If multiple data sources are integrated to provide comprehensive coverage, then the breadth of information improves, but the complexity of data reconciliation and verification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata breadthVSAvoidreconciliation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent standardizes diverse data sources by transforming them into unified data elements with consistent parameters, schemas, and metadata structures. This parameter standardization reduces reconciliation complexity while maintaining comprehensive data breadth, as standardized formats enable automated verification and integration processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs intermediary verification mechanisms that systematically reconcile conflicts between multiple data sources. These intermediaries apply consistent validation rules and resolution protocols, reducing the complexity of manual reconciliation while preserving comprehensive information from all sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260023753A1Aggregation of global story based on analyzed data
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 INVISIBLE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20260023753A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023753A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023753A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Data regarding a subject is received over a communication network. The data is parsed to extract data elements that are associated with various aspects of the subject. A plurality of sub-scores is calculated based on the values associated with the data elements. A combined score is calculated based on the plurality of sub-scores and weights corresponding to the plurality of sub-scores. An indication of the combined score associated with the subject is output.