Visualizing Historical Product Structure Evolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for representing product structures fail to provide a historical context of changes, as they only offer snapshots based on selected effectivity parameter values, lacking the ability to traceably capture and visualize the evolution of product structures over time.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that concatenates and graphically represents all change states associated with each item in a product structure, relative to effective parameters, allowing for the visualization of the historical product structure on an electronic display, enabling users to select and compare different effectivity parameter values and highlight changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional snapshot methods are used to represent product structures, then the representation is simple and easy to generate, but historical context and evolution of changes are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehistorical contextVSAvoidrepresentation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a temporal dimension to the product structure representation by displaying change states along a timeline. Instead of showing only a static snapshot at a single point in time, the system presents multiple change states (e.g., change states 1010, 1020, 1030) arranged chronologically, allowing users to visualize the evolution of the product structure over time while maintaining a manageable display through selective presentation of relevant changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If all change states are displayed to preserve complete history, then historical context is maintained, but the complexity of viewing and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange historyVSAvoidviewing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complete change history into discrete, manageable change state units (e.g., change state 1010, 1020, 1030). Each change state represents a specific point in time with associated product structure data. This segmentation allows the system to preserve complete historical information while presenting it in a structured, easily navigable format where users can view individual change states or select specific time periods for comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic viewing capabilities that allow users to interactively navigate through change states based on selected effectivity parameter values (e.g., date effectivity, version effectivity). Users can dynamically adjust the viewing window to focus on relevant time periods or compare specific change states, making the viewing process adaptive to user needs rather than presenting all data statically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If snapshots are taken at selected effectivity parameter values, then the view is simplified, but traceability of changes over time is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewing simplicityVSAvoidtraceability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that maintain the connection between selected effectivity parameter values and the corresponding change states. When users select specific parameter values (e.g., a date or version), the system provides feedback by displaying the appropriate change states and allowing navigation to related historical or future states. This feedback loop ensures traceability is maintained even when viewing simplified snapshots, as users can always navigate to see the full change history or compare different time points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9477933B2System and method for graphical representation of business documents and effectivity
Publication Date: 2016.10.25 SAP SE
  • US9477933B2 patent drawing
  • US9477933B2 patent drawing
  • US9477933B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method to graphically represent historical product structures. When a computer extracts all change states for a data set corresponding to a first product structure having a plurality of items. The change states associated with each item are concatenated. The concatenated change states relative to each item and to the parametric constraint effective for the data set are displayed on an electronic display. In this way it is possible to visualize the historical product structure.