Pari-Mutuel Wagering System for Historical Race Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pari-mutuel wagering systems, particularly in 'instant racing,' face challenges in providing users with the same level of excitement and entertainment experienced in live racing, as participants often cannot synchronize their wagers on historical races, leading to insufficiently large pools and reduced interest.

Innovation Solution

The system allows individual players to wager on previously-run order-of-finish contests, with modified totalisator and terminal control software enabling variable wagering experiences, customizable interfaces, and the ability to create and simulate 'events' from a database of past races, ensuring payouts depend on the finishing place of selected contestants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual players wager on previously-run contests independently, then user flexibility and accessibility are improved, but pool size and user engagement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser flexibilityVSAvoidpool size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple independent wagers into a unified simulated event, merging individual betting actions into a collective experience that replicates live racing dynamics. This allows users to wager independently while still contributing to a shared pool through the simulation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-determining race outcomes and collecting wagers before simulating the event. This allows the pool to be established in advance, ensuring sufficient funds are available while maintaining user flexibility in when they place their bets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If wagers are accepted continuously until race start, then user convenience is improved, but odds calculation accuracy and fairness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidodds calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes a predetermined wagering period that closes before the simulated race begins. This preliminary closure ensures all wagers are captured for accurate odds calculation while still providing users with a convenient extended betting window compared to traditional live racing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the wagering window based on the simulated event timeline, opening it for user convenience but automatically closing it at the appropriate moment before race start to ensure accurate odds calculation. This dynamic control balances user convenience with mathematical precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If fixed interfaces are used in wagering terminals, then system simplicity is improved, but user engagement and entertainment value deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiduser engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal interface dynamically adapts to display simulated race events with moving graphics and animated presentations, transforming a static wagering interface into an engaging visual experience while maintaining the underlying simple wagering functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a visual dimension to the wagering experience by incorporating simulated race graphics and animations into the terminal display, enhancing user engagement without complicating the core wagering mechanism. This dimensional addition transforms a purely textual interface into a multi-sensory experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9437078B2Method for pari-mutuel wagering
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 PARIMAX HOLDINGS LLC
  • US9437078B2 patent drawing
  • US9437078B2 patent drawing
  • US9437078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved method for allowing players to make pari-mutuel wagers on previously-run, order-of-finish contests (PROOFCs) includes the steps of enabling the operator of a pari-mutuel wagering enterprise to: (1) access the database of race conditions pertaining to each of the PROOFCs and assemble a specified collection of PROOFCs upon which a player may elect to wager or not wager on a specific PROOFC, (2) select the number of contestants and the race conditions applicable to each of the PROOFCs so as to yield a wagering experience for the player (with sufficiently variable results and an acceptable financial return on the player's wagers) that makes it likely the player will again use this improved method of wagering, and wherein the wagering is conducted such that whether a player's selection is determined to be a winner depends on the performance of the selected contestant.