Hitch Angle Warning System for Trailer Jackknife Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reversing a vehicle while towing a trailer can be challenging due to the need for opposite steering inputs, amplified steering errors leading to the trailer deviating from the desired path, and the risk of jackknife conditions, especially when switching between trailers with varying reactions to steering inputs.

Innovation Solution

A hitch angle warning system that includes a sensor to measure the hitch angle between the vehicle and trailer, a controller to estimate the time for the hitch angle to reach a threshold and generate a warning signal when it exceeds a safe time frame, preventing potential jackknife conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the driver manually controls the trailer during backup, then the driver can respond to steering inputs, but the driver may not have sufficient time to correct steering errors before a jackknife condition occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by calculating the time to jackknife (TTJ) and generating advance warnings before the critical jackknife condition occurs. The controller continuously monitors hitch angle and rate of change, predicting future jackknife risk and alerting the driver in advance, allowing sufficient time for corrective steering input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the hitch angle and rate of change, then providing real-time feedback to the driver through visual and audible warnings. The feedback loop includes calculating TTJ, comparing it against threshold values, and adjusting warning signals based on whether the trailer is approaching or moving away from the jackknife condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the driver uses small steering inputs to maintain control, then jackknife risk is reduced, but the trailer may still deviate from the desired path due to amplified steering errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidsteering control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback to the driver about the trailer's hitch angle and predicted time to jackknife, enabling the driver to make informed steering adjustments. The real-time monitoring and warning signals help the driver maintain optimal steering input magnitude without excessive corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By calculating and displaying the time to jackknife before the condition occurs, the system allows the driver to take preliminary corrective action. The advance warning gives the driver time to adjust steering input to prevent both jackknife and excessive trailer deviation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the driver quickly backs up the trailer to improve efficiency, then productivity increases, but the risk of jackknife conditions and steering errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup speedVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors hitch angle and rate of change continuously, providing real-time feedback that allows the driver to maintain higher backup speeds while staying within safe operating parameters. The dynamic TTJ calculation adapts to current speed and angle conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system calculates and warns of impending jackknife conditions before they occur, even during high-speed backup operations. This advance notice allows the driver to maintain productivity while having sufficient time to correct any developing issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the driver switches between various trailers with different characteristics, then versatility is improved, but the difficulty of control increases due to varying reactions to steering inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrailer compatibilityVSAvoidsteering control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to work universally with different trailer types by monitoring fundamental parameters (hitch angle and rate of change) that apply to all trailers. The controller calculates TTJ based on these universal parameters, providing consistent safety warnings regardless of trailer characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts to different trailers by continuously monitoring changes in hitch angle and rate of change parameters. The dynamic calculation of TTJ automatically adjusts to the specific trailer's response characteristics, allowing the same system to safely control various trailer types without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9517668B2Hitch angle warning system and method
Publication Date: 2016.12.13 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9517668B2 patent drawing
  • US9517668B2 patent drawing
  • US9517668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hitch angle warning system includes a camera-based hitch angle sensor that senses a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer. The hitch angle warning system also includes a controller that estimates an amount of time for the hitch angle to reach a threshold angle based on a rate of change of the hitch angle. The threshold angle may be set to a maximum hitch angle controllable by the vehicle based on a length of the trailer. The controller thereby generates a warning signal when the amount of time is less than a threshold time, which is configured to be greater or equal to than a response time of a driver of the vehicle to make a corrective action. The warning signal may be deactivated when the amount of time is greater than a second time that is greater than the threshold time.