Hydromechanical Transmission Feedforward Control for Stable Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior hydromechanical variable transmission (HVT) control strategies struggle to efficiently switch between torque and speed control modes, leading to reduced transmission efficiency, instability, and control inaccuracies due to oversimplified kinematics and complex non-linear characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A feedforward control architecture using a non-linear, multi-coefficient model is implemented for the hydrostatic unit, allowing for efficient and accurate control by calibrating coefficients through an automatic procedure, and strategically varying inputs between torque and speed control modes based on vehicle conditions, with junction filters ensuring continuity during mode switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a mechanical feedback control loop is used to control pump displacement, then the control is simple and straightforward, but the differential pressure is not directly controllable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoiddifferential pressure controllability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a hydraulic valve as an intermediary component between the controller and the pump control piston. The valve mediates the control by receiving controller signals and adjusting hydraulic pressure to the piston, enabling both simple control operation and precise differential pressure control through the valve's pressure regulation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If direct pressure control of hydraulic fluid on control piston chambers is used, then flexibility is improved, but the system becomes complex with non-linear characteristics that are difficult to identify and use accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the controller receives information about the actual system state (pump displacement, differential pressure) and adjusts the valve control signals accordingly. This feedback loop simplifies the control by allowing the system to automatically compensate for non-linear characteristics without requiring complex identification models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The hydraulic valve serves as an intermediary that linearizes the control relationship. By controlling valve opening rather than directly controlling piston chamber pressure, the system transforms a non-linear pressure-displacement relationship into a more linear valve-opening-to-pressure relationship that is easier to control accurately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If hydrostatic unit is controlled in torque control mode or speed control mode, then specific control objectives are met, but switching between modes causes control lag, instability, and oscillation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mode adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode switching with continuous control transition. The controller dynamically adjusts control parameters based on operating conditions and uses interpolation or blending between torque and speed control modes during transitions, preventing abrupt changes that cause oscillation and instability while maintaining adaptability to different operating requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If oversimplified transmission kinematics are used in control strategy, then control implementation is easier, but control accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation easeVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation from simplified kinematic relationships to actual measured operating parameters (actual pump displacement, actual differential pressure, motor speed, torque). By using real measured parameters instead of simplified calculated ones, the control maintains high accuracy while the controller implementation remains straightforward through direct sensor feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances transmission performance by reducing control latency and conserving processing resources, enabling seamless switching between modes and improving accuracy and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a hydrostatic pump and motor. In some designs the hydrostatic pump is a variable displacement pump. In this design, a displacement of the pump depends on an angle of a swash plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic fluid displacement: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

the controller may adjust a position of a double-action pump control piston to control the angle of the swash plate, via a pressure of the hydraulic fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure transmission: Pascal's Law

Implementation Method 3

a hydrostatic pump and motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic motor conversion: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS12258021B2Hydromechanical transmission and control method
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 DANA ITAL SRL
  • US12258021B2 patent drawing
  • US12258021B2 patent drawing
  • US12258021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for controlling a hydromechanical transmission are proposed. In one example, a control method for a hydrostatic unit of a hydromechanical variable transmission (HVT) is presented, comprising controlling the hydrostatic unit via a feedforward control architecture including a non-linear, multi-coefficient model, wherein the hydrostatic unit comprises a hydrostatic pump and a hydrostatic motor and a desired differential pressure of the hydrostatic unit or a desired hydraulic pump displacement may be used as inputs for the model, where the model's output is a pressure difference for a pump control piston coupled to a swash plate of the hydrostatic unit. Use of the non-linear model permits the hydrostatic unit to be controlled based on load, speed, and/or torque, thereby increasing the adaptability of the control system.