Hoisted Structure Braking System with Active Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety braking systems for hoisted structures, such as elevator systems, are complex and semi-passive, failing to provide precise control over braking force and often require multiple components, which can lead to inefficiencies and instability.

Innovation Solution

A braking system with a brake member that frictionally engages a guide rail, actuated by an electromechanical mechanism or solenoid, allowing for controlled braking force application through frictional engagement, and utilizing a biasing spring for actuation, enabling active control of the braking force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex mechanism with governor, governor rope, tension device and safety actuation module is used to actuate the braking device, then the braking system can provide reliable actuation, but the device complexity increases and weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking actuation reliabilityVSAvoidbraking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary components from the traditional braking mechanism. Specifically, it removes the governor, governor rope, and tension device, retaining only the essential brake member and actuation mechanism. This simplification reduces device complexity while maintaining braking reliability through direct actuation of the brake member by the actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple functions into the brake member itself. The brake member integrates the braking function with the actuation interface, eliminating the need for separate components like lift rods and linkages. This consolidation reduces the number of parts and simplifies the overall mechanism while preserving reliable braking actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If traditional semi-passive braking systems are used, then the system structure is simpler, but control over braking force is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking system structureVSAvoidbraking force control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the braking system from a static, semi-passive mechanism to a dynamic, actively controlled system. The actuator is configured to actively control the position of the brake member, enabling real-time adjustment of braking force. This dynamic control allows the system to adapt braking force to operational requirements while maintaining a relatively simple structural configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple components are used in the braking mechanism, then actuation reliability is improved, but weight of the hoisted structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking system reliabilityVSAvoidhoisted structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes heavy components such as the governor assembly, governor rope, and tension device from the braking system. By eliminating these unnecessary parts, the overall weight of the hoisted structure is reduced while braking reliability is maintained through the simplified direct-actuation mechanism consisting of the brake member and actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system simplifies the braking mechanism, provides precise control over braking force, reduces weight and complexity, and ensures reliable deceleration and holding of the hoisted structure, enhancing safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a brake member for coupling to the hoisted structure and having a brake surface configured to frictionally engage the guide rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a biasing spring for actuation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

the brake member actuation mechanism comprises a solenoid operatively coupled to the brake member with a biasing member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS10486939B2Breaking system for a hoisted structure and method of controlling braking a hoisted structure
Publication Date: 2019.11.26 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • US10486939B2 patent drawing
  • US10486939B2 patent drawing
  • US10486939B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A braking system for a hoisted structure guided along a guide rail is provided. The braking system includes a brake member for coupling to the hoisted structure and having a brake surface configured to frictionally engage the guide rail, the brake member moveable between a braking position and a non-braking position. Further included is a brake member actuation mechanism operatively coupled to the brake member and configured to actuate the brake member from the non-braking position to the braking position, the brake member actuation mechanism remaining coupled to the brake member in the braking position to control the braking force applied on the hoisted structure by the frictional engagement between the guide rail and the brake member.