Holistic Evaluation Score for Machine Learning Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning evaluation techniques lack holistic metrics for the complete lifecycle of machine learning systems, are not applicable to graph neural networks or graph training datasets, and fail to provide systematic processes for responsible artificial intelligence metrics, leading to issues like lack of explainability and traceability of model performance degradation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method generates a holistic evaluation score for machine learning models by aggregating data, model, and decision evaluation scores across various lifecycle stages, applicable to tabular, media, and graph-based datasets, using a pipeline of evaluation techniques to ensure traceability and fairness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional single-aspect evaluation techniques are used, then the evaluation process is simple, but the evaluation comprehensiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the machine learning model evaluation into three distinct aspects: data evaluation (assessing training dataset quality), model evaluation (assessing performance metrics), and decision evaluation (assessing output class fairness). Each aspect is evaluated separately using specialized techniques, then integrated into a holistic evaluation score. This segmentation allows comprehensive evaluation while maintaining manageable complexity through modular assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple evaluation scores from different aspects (data evaluation score, model evaluation score, decision evaluation score) into a single holistic evaluation score. This combining approach provides a comprehensive view of model performance while simplifying the final assessment decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of information

If existing evaluation techniques are used, then the implementation is straightforward, but the traceability to root cause is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetraceabilityVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the evaluation into separate data, model, and decision aspects, the patent enables traceability to specific problem areas. When the holistic evaluation score indicates degradation, practitioners can examine each aspect individually to identify the root cause - whether it lies in data quality, model performance, or decision fairness - rather than dealing with a black-box overall score.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional evaluation metrics are used, then the applicability to single model types is maintained, but the universality across different datasets is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedataset type universalityVSAvoidevaluation technique complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal evaluation framework that can assess machine learning models across different dataset types (tabular, media, text, graph-based) by using aspect-specific evaluation techniques appropriate for each data type. The holistic evaluation score aggregates results from these specialized assessments, providing a unified metric that works universally across diverse datasets while maintaining the nuances needed for each specific type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240256957A1Tiered evaluation metric for comprehensively evaluating machine learning models
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 OPTUM SERVICES IRELAND LTD
  • US20240256957A1 patent drawing
  • US20240256957A1 patent drawing
  • US20240256957A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure describe holistic machine learning model evaluation techniques. The techniques include determining a holistic evaluation vector for a target machine learning model based on a plurality of evaluation scores for the target machine learning model. The plurality of evaluation scores may include a data evaluation score corresponding to a training dataset for the target machine learning model, a model evaluation score corresponding to one or more performance metrics for the target machine learning model, and a decision evaluation score corresponding to an output class of the target machine learning model. A holistic evaluation score for the target machine learning model may be determined from the holistic evaluation vector or a plurality of evaluation scores. An informed evaluation output is provided based on the holistic vector or score.