Holistic Medical Residency Matching via Diversity and Competency Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The medical residency selection process primarily relies on academic factors, leading to the exclusion of applicants from medical schools with limited resources, despite their potential, in favor of those from more resourceful institutions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for holistic medical student and residency matching that generates diversity and competency scores by parsing applicant profiles, converting textual data into numerical values, and calculating representative scores for enhanced diversity and competency evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If academic factors such as USMLE scores and number of publications are used to assess applicants, then manufacturing precision (assessment accuracy) is improved, but object-affected harmful factors (exclusion of qualified applicants from under-resourced schools) increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidexclusion of qualified applicants
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating separate evaluation dimensions: one for academic metrics (USMLE, publications) and another for contextual factors (school resources, availability of opportunities). This allows each aspect to be evaluated with appropriate criteria, so that applicants from under-resourced schools are not penalized for factors beyond their control while still maintaining high academic standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of evaluation by introducing a holistic scoring system that transforms traditional single-dimension academic metrics into a multi-dimensional assessment framework. This includes weighting different factors differently and creating composite scores that reflect both academic capability and contextual circumstances, thereby reducing the harmful exclusion effect while maintaining assessment rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If traditional academic metrics are prioritized in selection, then productivity (selection efficiency) is improved, but loss of information (applicant potential from diverse backgrounds) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection efficiencyVSAvoidapplicant potential
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the applicant evaluation into distinct components: academic achievements, school resource context, personal attributes, and demonstrated potential. Each segment is evaluated separately using appropriate metrics, then integrated into a comprehensive profile. This segmentation allows efficient processing of each component while preserving the full picture of applicant potential that would be lost in a single aggregated metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional evaluation system that can assess various types of applicants from different medical schools using a unified holistic framework. The system adapts to evaluate both applicants from resource-rich institutions and those from under-resourced schools using the same comprehensive criteria, ensuring no potential is lost due to background differences while maintaining consistent selection standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11783244B2Methods and systems for holistic medical student and medical residency matching
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 OHR ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US11783244B2 patent drawing
  • US11783244B2 patent drawing
  • US11783244B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for holistically ranking medical student and medical residency matching including, generating an applicant profile, determining a diversity score as a function of data in the applicant profile, determining a competency score as a function of data in the applicant profile, and calculating a representative score as a function of the diversity score and the competency score. Further, the method includes presenting, via a graphical user interface (GUI) a graphical representation of the representative score.