Computer Generated Hologram Depth Correction via Slice Decomposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing computer-generated holographic images using Spatial Light Modulators (SLMs) face challenges in efficiently calculating and optimizing complex amplitude values for 3D scenes, leading to reduced image quality and increased computational load due to the need for precise depth corrections and iterative processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves decomposing a 2D image of a 3D scene into multiple slices along the viewing direction, applying corrections such as quadratic phase, Fresnel, and angular spectrum corrections to each slice, and summing the corrected complex amplitudes to produce a 3D holographic image, thereby reducing computational complexity and improving image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If iterative methods are used to produce complex amplitude for 2D image, then image quality is improved, but computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the 3D scene into multiple 2D slices at different depths along the viewing direction. Each slice is processed independently to generate its complex amplitude, avoiding the need for a single complex iterative process for the entire 3D scene. This segmentation reduces computational load while maintaining image quality through depth-resolved processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies depth corrections and quadratic phase adjustments to each 2D slice before combining them into the final 3D holographic image. By performing these corrections in advance on individual slices, the method avoids more complex iterative optimization while achieving accurate depth representation and high image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If depth corrections are applied to each slice, then 3D image accuracy is improved, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies quadratic phase corrections and depth adjustments by modifying the complex amplitude parameters of each 2D slice. By changing these optical parameters directly in the complex amplitude domain, the method achieves accurate depth representation without requiring complex geometric transformations or iterative optimization, thus improving depth accuracy while keeping calculations manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple slices are processed individually, then 3D holographic image quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholographic image qualityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or iterative optimization processes with direct mathematical operations in the complex amplitude domain. By using quadratic phase corrections and analytical solutions instead of iterative mechanical adjustments, the method processes multiple slices efficiently while maintaining high holographic image quality, thus improving processing speed without sacrificing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the quality of 3D holographic images by simplifying the calculation process, reducing computational load, and improving image fidelity, while maintaining the efficiency of the hologram generation process.

Implementation Method 1

a holographic image of a 3D object produced by modulating light by a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight modulation:

Implementation Method 2

shining coherent light onto the SLM

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoherent light: Coherent Light

Implementation Method 3

the making a correction for depths of each one of the slices along the viewing direction includes adding a quadratic phase correction to the first complex amplitude

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuadratic phase correction:

Implementation Method 4

the making a correction for depths of each one of the slices along the viewing direction includes adding a Fresnel correction to the first complex amplitude

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFresnel correction: Fresnel Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS11520288B2Producing a computer generated holographic image
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 REAL VIEW IMAGING
  • US11520288B2 patent drawing
  • US11520288B2 patent drawing
  • US11520288B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of producing a Computer Generated Hologram (CGH) for producing a 3 dimensional (3D) holographic image, including receiving data describing a 3D scene, producing a first CGH for producing a 2D image of the 3D scene as viewed from a specific viewing direction, the 2D image perpendicular to the viewing direction, decomposing the 2D image to a plurality of slices at different depths along the viewing direction, adjusting the first CGH by making, for at least one of the plurality of slices, a correction to the CGH associated with a depth of the slice along the viewing direction, thereby producing a corrected CGH for producing a 3D holographic image of the 3D scene. Related apparatus and methods are also described.