Holographic Wavefield Imaging Decimation for Living Tissue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital imaging methods for living tissue and geophysical volumes face limitations in sampling efficiency and image quality, failing to optimize data processing and sampling ratios, which affects the resolution and cost-effectiveness of imaging processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining wavefield data, selecting a holographic computational method such as Kirchhoff diffraction stacking or wavefield synthesis, decimating data subsets based on technical and business parameters, and generating new digital images with improved quality, while determining quantitative differences in sampling and image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional digital imaging methods are used, then imaging can be performed, but sampling efficiency is low and image quality is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsampling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the sampling ratio (decimation factor) to optimize the balance between image quality and processing efficiency. Different decimation levels are tested to find the optimal parameter setting that achieves acceptable image quality with reduced data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by selecting data subsets at different decimation levels rather than processing complete datasets. This allows the system to achieve sufficient image quality with a portion of the available data, improving sampling efficiency while maintaining acceptable diagnostic standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Manufacturing precision

If higher sampling ratios are used, then image resolution improves, but processing costs and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by processing data subsets with different decimation factors rather than analyzing complete datasets. This approach achieves sufficient image resolution for diagnostic purposes while significantly reducing the computational time and resources required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the decimation factor based on diagnostic requirements and processing constraints. The sampling ratio is not fixed but can be optimized in real-time to balance image resolution quality with processing speed, allowing flexible adaptation to different diagnostic scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If complete data sets are processed, then image quality is maximized, but computational resources and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts essential diagnostic information by processing selected data subsets rather than complete datasets. By applying decimation to remove redundant data while preserving critical signal components, the system achieves acceptable image quality with reduced computational resource consumption and lower processing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the processing parameter (decimation factor) to optimize the trade-off between image quality and computational cost. By systematically evaluating different decimation levels, the patent identifies the parameter setting that provides sufficient diagnostic quality with minimal computational resource expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances image quality and reduces costs by optimizing sampling ratios and processing efficiency, leading to improved resolution and cost savings in digital imaging applications.

Implementation Method 1

obtaining wavefield data representing recordings of a propagating wavefield through living tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWave propagation:

Implementation Method 2

selecting a holographic computational method of imaging the wavefield data from a group consisting of the Kirchhoff diffraction stacking method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 3

selecting a holographic computational method of imaging the wavefield data from a group consisting of the Kirchhoff diffraction stacking method, the Kirchhoff wave front 'smear' method, wavefield synthesis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWavefield synthesis:

Data Source

PatentUS12165403B2Methods for digital imaging of living tissue
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 NEIDELL NORMAN
  • US12165403B2 patent drawing
  • US12165403B2 patent drawing
  • US12165403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of providing digital images of living tissue that may include: obtaining data of a propagating wavefield through living tissue; obtaining a reference digital image of the living tissue; selecting a holographic computational method of wavefield imaging; selecting a wavefield based on one or more parameters; calculating a sampling ratio by dividing a number of data samples in the data subset by a number of image samples in the data subset; decimating the data subset; generating a new digital image based on the selected holographic computational method of imaging, the decimated data subset, and parameters corresponding to the data subset; and determining a quantitative difference measure between the reference digital image and the new digital image based on the changing of one or more parameters selected from the group consisting of field sampling, imaging sampling, and image quality.