Holomorphic Embedding Load-flow Method Control Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing powerflow studies in electrical networks face challenges in accurately incorporating and simulating the effects of control devices, particularly due to unpredictable dynamics and conflicts among control variables, which complicates the convergence and analysis of numerical iterations.

Innovation Solution

The Holomorphic Embedding Load-flow Method (HELM) is extended to include control devices by transforming the nonlinear powerflow problem into an infinite sequence of chained linear systems, using complex analysis techniques and Singular Value Decomposition to handle conflicts and ensure robustness, allowing for the simulation of smooth and unbounded control devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If iterative powerflow methods are used to incorporate control devices, then the ability to take into account control limits is improved, but convergence behavior becomes harder to model and analyze

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to take into account control limitsVSAvoidconvergence behavior modeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the iterative numerical approach (mechanical iteration system) with a non-iterative analytical approach based on complex analysis and holomorphic embedding. This substitution eliminates convergence issues while maintaining the ability to handle control limits through the embedding parameter formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an embedding parameter that transforms the original powerflow equations into a family of problems parameterized by this new variable. By changing the parameter space and using series expansion techniques, the method achieves exact solutions without iteration, thereby resolving the convergence complexity while preserving control limit handling capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If iterative powerflow methods are used with outer loop approach, then control variables can be adjusted in between iterations, but the unpredictable dynamics of numerical iteration makes solution selection difficult when multiple saturated controls exist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol variable adjustment capabilityVSAvoidsolution selection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the unpredictable iterative adjustment process with a deterministic analytical solution using complex analysis. The holomorphic embedding method provides a systematic way to handle multiple saturated controls through the mathematical structure of the embedded equations, eliminating the randomness of numerical iteration dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates control feedback mechanisms directly into the embedded powerflow equations through the embedding parameter. This allows control variables to be adjusted systematically based on the embedded constraint equations, providing reliable solution selection even when multiple saturated controls exist, without relying on unpredictable iterative dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the base HELM method is used, then non-iterative and deterministic calculation is achieved, but control devices and their effects cannot be incorporated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speed and determinismVSAvoidcontrol device incorporation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the base HELM method to create a universal framework that can handle both standard powerflow calculations and control device incorporation simultaneously. The extended method maintains the non-iterative deterministic nature of the original HELM while adding the capability to model various control devices through the embedding parameter formulation and constraint equation modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the control device effects into separate constraint equations that are embedded into the powerflow formulation. By dividing the overall problem into the base powerflow equations and additional control constraint equations, the method maintains the computational efficiency of the original HELM while systematically incorporating control device effects through the embedding approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10594136B1System and method to simulate controls in the holomorphic embedding loadflow calculation
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 TRIAS ANTONIO
  • US10594136B1 patent drawing
  • US10594136B1 patent drawing
  • US10594136B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method is presented for enabling the simulation of smooth, unlimited controls in the Holomorphic Embedding Load-flow Method (HELM) for calculating power flows. These are controls that can be expressed as differentiable algebraic expressions of the voltages or power flows. The invention draws on the ability of HELM to turn the powerflow problem into a sequence of linear problems, as well as on the powerful physical intuition that is gained by the underlying methodology. The outcome is that any kind of smooth and unlimited control can be accommodated under the HELM method, preserving all its fundamental properties of reliability and determinism on the obtained solutions. One particularly interesting feature is the automatic treatment of conflicting and/or overlapping controls in an optimal way, via SVD techniques.