Home Automation System Behavior Detection and Adaptive Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing home automation systems require significant user input and fail to efficiently adapt settings based on user behavior, leading to inefficiencies in energy usage and security measures.

Innovation Solution

A home automation system that includes a processor, memory, and instructions to continuously detect user behavior, determine intended actions, and adaptively update settings such as security, HVAC, and lighting based on detected behavior, with the ability to communicate with users if intended actions are not completed within predetermined time periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If home automation systems require significant user input to control settings, then the system can accurately respond to user needs, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to excessive user interaction requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiduser behavior data
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The home automation system automatically detects user behavior patterns through sensors and monitors without requiring explicit user input. The system infers user intentions and autonomously adjusts settings such as lighting, temperature, and security based on detected patterns, enabling the system to serve itself by learning from observed behavior rather than requiring continuous user commands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user behavior and uses this feedback to adaptively adjust automation settings. By establishing a closed-loop system where sensor data about user actions feeds back to the control algorithm, the system dynamically optimizes settings based on real-time behavioral patterns, resolving the contradiction between automatic adaptation and user input requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system continuously monitors user behavior to adapt settings, then the adaptability improves, but the use of energy increases due to continuous detection operations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system employs periodic detection cycles where sensors are activated at intervals to capture user behavior patterns. The system switches between active monitoring phases and low-power standby phases, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining sufficient data collection for adaptive settings adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-loads and caches detection algorithms and processing routines in memory before they are needed, allowing for efficient execution during active monitoring periods. By preparing processing capabilities in advance during low-power states, the system minimizes real-time computational energy requirements while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system waits for user confirmation before executing actions, then the reliability improves, but the loss of time increases due to waiting periods

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidtime delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system executes automation actions based on partial confirmation through behavioral patterns rather than requiring complete explicit user confirmation. When detected behavior patterns strongly indicate user intent, the system proceeds with the action without additional confirmation steps, reducing time delays while maintaining reliability through pattern-based verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-approves common automation actions by learning user preferences and behavior patterns over time. For routine actions consistent with established patterns, the system executes them immediately without requiring repeated confirmation, while reserving confirmation requirements for novel or significant actions, thus reducing overall time delays while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10203665B2Managing home automation system based on behavior and user input
Publication Date: 2019.02.12 VIVINT INC
  • US10203665B2 patent drawing
  • US10203665B2 patent drawing
  • US10203665B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described for controlling settings of an automation system, such as a home and/or business automation system. According to at least one embodiment, an apparatus for controlling settings of an automation system includes a processor, a memory in electronic communication with the processor, and instructions stored in the memory which are executable by a processor to receive instructions about an intended action by a user of the home automation system, continuously detect behavior of the user with the home automation system, determine whether the intended action has occurred based on the detected behavior, and adaptively update one or more settings of the home automation system when the intended action is determined to have occurred.