Automated Sensor Registration in Home Security Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional home security systems require substantial manual intervention for installation and diagnostics, leading to increased installation time and error rates due to the need for individual manual verification of security sensors and communication with the central office.

Innovation Solution

An installation and diagnostic application that establishes a link between security sensors and the on-site console, and subsequently the central office, allowing for automated signal transmission and acknowledgement, reducing the need for manual communication and streamlining the installation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual verification of each security sensor is performed during installation, then installation accuracy and reliability are improved, but installation time and complexity increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation reliabilityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service installation by allowing security sensors to automatically register themselves with the on-site console and central office without requiring manual verification. The sensors transmit their identifiers and status automatically, and the system autonomously processes their registration, eliminating the need for technicians to manually test and verify each sensor individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring the on-site console to automatically recognize and register security sensors as they are installed. The console is prepared in advance to receive sensor identifiers and automatically associate them with the appropriate monitoring protocols, so that when sensors are installed, their verification is already streamlined and does not require manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual communication with central office is required for each sensor verification, then installation accuracy is improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor registration accuracyVSAvoidinstallation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the sensor verification and registration processes into a single automated communication flow. Instead of requiring separate manual verification steps and separate communication actions, the system combines these functions so that a single automated message from the sensor triggers both verification and registration at the on-site console and central office simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The on-site console acts as an intermediary that automatically manages the communication between security sensors and the central office. It receives sensor identifiers, performs automated verification, and handles the registration process without requiring direct manual communication between the technician and the central office, thereby simplifying the installation process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If individual manual calls are made to verify each security sensor, then signal reception confirmation is improved, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal reception confirmationVSAvoidinstallation productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic automated verification where the on-site console systematically checks signal reception from multiple security sensors in sequence without requiring manual intervention for each one. This periodic automated process maintains reliable confirmation of signal reception while significantly improving installation productivity by handling multiple sensors efficiently in a standardized cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual telephone calls with an electronic automated communication system. The on-site console electronically verifies signal reception from security sensors through automated data exchange, eliminating the need for technicians to make individual manual calls while maintaining reliable confirmation and substantially improving installation productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10491495B2Home automation system deployment
Publication Date: 2019.11.26 TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US10491495B2 patent drawing
  • US10491495B2 patent drawing
  • US10491495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technician assistance application aids installation and diagnostics for an automated home monitoring system often referred to as an “Intelligent Home” system. The monitoring system includes a plurality of security sensor devices deployed around a dwelling and responsive to a monitoring application on a central computing device. The central computing device provides an on-site console for gathering signals from the security sensors and forwarding the gathered signals to a monitoring station or central office. The central office interprets the received signals to identify an anomaly or other signal consistent with a need to notify first responders or otherwise trigger an alarm. In addition to basic intrusion and fire protection, the monitoring system may monitor a variety of other non-emergency aspects such as lights, visual camera signals, door locks and environmental conditions.