Homogenized Emulsion Explosive Bubble Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanically-gassed emulsion explosives face issues with gas bubble migration and coalescence due to low viscosity, leading to uneven distribution of gas bubbles and potential undetonability.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system and method for manufacturing mechanically-gassed homogenized emulsion explosives, which involves multiple stages of gassing and homogenization to increase the viscosity of the emulsion, thereby reducing gas bubble migration and coalescence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the emulsion explosive is kept at low viscosity for ease of handling and delivery, then the ease of operation is improved, but gas bubble migration and coalescence increase leading to poor homogeneity and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of handlingVSAvoiddetonation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the viscosity of the emulsion explosive within a specific range (100-10,000 cP) to optimize both handling characteristics and gas bubble stability. By adjusting viscosity parameters, the system achieves sufficient gas bubble retention while maintaining ease of delivery and handling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining the emulsion explosive with gas bubbles in a controlled manner. The emulsion serves as both the explosive medium and the matrix that holds gas bubbles, creating a composite structure where the continuous phase maintains cohesion while dispersed gas bubbles provide sensitivity without causing harmful migration or coalescence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple stages of gassing and homogenization are implemented to improve gas bubble distribution, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas bubble distribution uniformityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the gassing process into multiple discrete stages with specific parameters. Each stage involves controlled gas injection followed by homogenization, allowing precise control over gas bubble size, distribution, and concentration. This segmented approach achieves uniform gas bubble distribution while keeping each individual stage relatively simple and controllable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing homogenization steps between gas injection stages. This preliminary homogenization ensures that gas bubbles are evenly distributed before the next gassing stage begins, preventing coalescence and achieving uniform final distribution. The preliminary action of homogenization prepares the emulsion for the next phase of gas incorporation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the viscosity of the emulsion is increased to reduce gas bubble mobility, then the compositional stability is improved, but the ease of delivery and handling decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompositional stabilityVSAvoidease of delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing viscosity within the range of 100-10,000 cP. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient viscosity to prevent gas bubble migration and maintain compositional stability, while remaining low enough to allow easy delivery through standard equipment and handling operations. The specific viscosity range represents the optimal balance point between these competing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The increased viscosity of the homogenized emulsion explosive results in improved compositional stability, reduced gas bubble mobility, and enhanced detonation reliability, eliminating the issues of uneven gas distribution and undetonability.

Implementation Method 1

A homogenizer may be configured to homogenize the stream by applying shear stress to the stream. The homogenizer may comprise a plurality of homogenizing stages, each stage having such an arrangement of elements.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

The system may be configured to sensitize the emulsion matrix by introducing gas bubbles into the stream.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas injection: Injector

Data Source

PatentUS20250130030A1Systems and methods for homogenizing mechanically-gassed explosives
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 DYNO NOBEL INC
  • US20250130030A1 patent drawing
  • US20250130030A1 patent drawing
  • US20250130030A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for delivering explosive mixtures with gas bubbles that are resistant to in-borehole migration or coalescence are disclosed herein. Such explosive can be sensitized by mechanically introducing gas bubbles into the explosive matrix in a number of gassing stages. Resistance to gas bubble migration and coalescence without the need for bubble stabilization agents can be achieved by homogenization in a number of homogenizing stages.