Homomorphic Encryption Data Packing for Convolution Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Homomorphic encryption methods face efficiency issues when performing convolution operations with a stride greater than 1, leading to reduced computational efficiency due to decreased data density in output ciphertexts, which worsens with repeated operations.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves generating packed data by encoding and encrypting an image into a one-dimensional vector, determining a mapping constant based on the tensor dimensions, and performing data packing to maintain high data density during convolution operations, allowing for efficient homomorphic encryption even with larger strides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If convolution is performed with a stride greater than 1 in homomorphic encryption, then the operation can cover larger data ranges, but the density of valid data in the output ciphertext decreases by the square of the stride, reducing computational efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvolution stride rangeVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the convolution operation into two distinct phases: a first convolution with stride 1 that maintains high data density, and a second convolution with stride greater than 1 that achieves broader coverage. This segmentation allows each phase to optimize for its specific purpose, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first convolution with stride 1 is performed as a preliminary action before the second convolution with larger stride. This preliminary operation prepares the data by maintaining high density and extracting fine-grained features, which then serve as input for the second operation that covers larger ranges. This sequential approach ensures that computational efficiency is preserved while achieving versatile coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple convolutions with stride greater than 1 are performed, then larger data ranges are processed, but computational efficiency continuously decreases by factors such as 16 times and 64 times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata range coverageVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the processing into a first convolution stage with stride 1 and a second convolution stage with stride greater than 1. This segmentation ensures that the time-consuming operation is performed only once at the appropriate stage, rather than repeatedly in multiple convolutions with large strides, thereby preventing continuous time loss while maintaining data range coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by ensuring that each convolution operation processes meaningful data without redundant computations. The first convolution with stride 1 continuously extracts dense features, and the second convolution with larger stride continuously processes these features efficiently, avoiding the repeated time-consuming operations that would occur with multiple large-stride convolutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If data is packed densely to improve computational efficiency, then operation speed increases, but the complexity of data packing and mapping increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation speedVSAvoiddata packing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the stride parameter between two convolution operations: stride 1 for the first convolution to maximize data density and operation speed, and stride greater than 1 for the second convolution to achieve broader coverage. This parameter change allows the system to optimize for speed when needed while maintaining manageable packing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the data packing complexity into two manageable parts: the first convolution with stride 1 handles dense packing with simple, repeatable patterns, while the second convolution with larger stride handles sparse packing with reduced complexity due to fewer operations. This segmentation prevents the accumulation of excessive packing complexity while maintaining high operation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230188317A1Apparatus and method with homomorphic encryption
Publication Date: 2023.06.15 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20230188317A1 patent drawing
  • US20230188317A1 patent drawing
  • US20230188317A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes: one or more processors configured to: generate packed data by performing data packing on an encrypted image; and perform a homomorphic encryption operation based on the packed data and a weight.