Wall Flow Honeycomb Filter Coating Uniformity

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wall flow filters face challenges in maintaining uniform coating depositions and controlling pressure drop variability during emissions treatment, particularly in gasoline particulate filters used in conjunction with gasoline direct injection engines, which emit more particulates than conventional engines.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a plugged honeycomb filter body with intersecting porous walls, where a hydrophobic material is applied to one side and a catalytic material to the opposite side, followed by removal of the hydrophobic material during a calcining process, to create a uniform and predictable coating deposition and reduce pressure drop variability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If hydrophobic material is applied to one side of porous ceramic base portions and catalytic material to the opposite side, then uniform coating deposition is achieved and pressure drop variability is reduced, but the manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The honeycomb filter body is segmented into treated sides (with hydrophobic material) and non-treated sides (with catalytic material), allowing different materials to be applied to different regions. This segmentation enables precise control over coating deposition uniformity while managing process complexity through systematic material placement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrophobic material serves as an intermediary layer applied to one side of the porous ceramic base portions before catalytic material application. This intermediary layer prevents washcoat penetration into treated regions, ensuring uniform coating deposition and reducing pressure drop variability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If washcoat is applied to catalytic material, then catalytic activity is enhanced, but pressure drop increases due to washcoat penetration into porous structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrophobic material is applied preliminarily to treated sides before catalytic material deposition. This preliminary application creates a protective barrier that prevents washcoat penetration into the porous ceramic structure, thereby maintaining low pressure drop while still allowing catalytic activity to function effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the porous ceramic base portions are given different properties: treated sides have hydrophobic material for washcoat prevention, while non-treated sides have catalytic material for emissions treatment. This local differentiation optimizes both catalytic activity and pressure drop characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures high permeability and uniformity of the coating process, maintaining the filter's performance by preventing washcoat penetration into treated regions and preserving the porous structure, thereby enhancing filtration efficiency and reducing pressure drop.

Implementation Method 1

treated sides comprising hydrophobic material deposits disposed at one of the inlet sides or the outlet sides of the porous ceramic base portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobicity: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

non-treated sides comprising a catalytic material disposed at opposite sides of the porous ceramic base portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

exhaust gas to be filtered enters inlet cells and passes through the cell walls to exit the filter via outlet channels, with the particulates being trapped on or within the inlet cell walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical filtration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS20240382944A1Wall flow honeycomb filters and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2024.11.21
  • US20240382944A1 patent drawing
  • US20240382944A1 patent drawing
  • US20240382944A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method of making and filtration article comprising a plugged honeycomb filter body comprising: intersecting porous walls extending an axial length in an axial direction from a proximal end to a distal end of the honeycomb filter body and defining a plurality of axial channels comprised of inlet channels, which are plugged at the distal end of the plugged honeycomb filter body, and outlet channels, which are plugged at the proximal end of the plugged honeycomb filter body, the porous walls comprising: porous ceramic base portions with a plurality of pores and an average thickness and having inlet sides and outlet sides; inlet surfaces defining the inlet channels; outlet surfaces defining the outlet channels; and treated sides comprising hydrophobic material deposits disposed at one of the inlet sides or the outlet sides of the porous ceramic base portions.