3D Honeycomb Retinal Electrode Array for Reduced Crosstalk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional planar stimulation arrays for visual prostheses face challenges in scaling to small, densely packed pixels due to increased crosstalk and rising stimulation thresholds, which become biologically unsafe at desirable pixel sizes for retinal implants.

Innovation Solution

A 3-dimensional electrode array configuration with honeycomb-shaped cavities allows retinal cells to migrate into voids, aligning the electric field vertically and decoupling penetration depth from pixel width, reducing stimulation thresholds and enabling smaller pixel sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pixel size is reduced in planar stimulation arrays, then visual acuity is improved, but stimulation threshold increases and becomes biologically unsafe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual acuityVSAvoidstimulation threshold
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a planar 2D electrode array to a 3D honeycomb structure with vertical walls. This dimensional change creates cavities that confine the electric field vertically, allowing the field penetration depth to be decoupled from the pixel width. The vertical confinement enables smaller pixel sizes to achieve the same stimulation threshold, thereby improving visual acuity without increasing current density to unsafe levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The planar electrode surface is segmented into discrete honeycomb cavities, each acting as an independent stimulation unit. The vertical walls of each cavity segment the electric field, preventing lateral spread and reducing crosstalk between adjacent pixels. This segmentation allows for denser pixel packing while maintaining safe stimulation thresholds through improved spatial selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If pixel size is reduced in planar stimulation arrays, then visual acuity is improved, but crosstalk between adjacent pixels increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual acuityVSAvoidcrosstalk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By introducing vertical walls to create 3D honeycomb cavities, the electric field is confined in the vertical dimension. This vertical confinement prevents lateral spread of the electric field into adjacent pixels, thereby reducing crosstalk. The field penetration depth is controlled by cavity depth rather than pixel width, enabling smaller pixels with reduced crosstalk for improved visual acuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Each honeycomb cavity provides localized electric field confinement through its vertical walls. The local geometry of each cavity creates a focused stimulation zone that limits the spread of electric field lines to the immediate vicinity of the active electrode, reducing interference with adjacent pixels and enabling higher spatial resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If pixel size is reduced in planar stimulation arrays, then visual acuity is improved, but current density becomes excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual acuityVSAvoidcurrent density
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The transition to 3D honeycomb cavities with vertical walls creates a new dimension for electric field confinement. The field penetration depth is now determined by cavity depth rather than pixel width, decoupling these two parameters. This allows pixel size to be reduced for improved visual acuity while maintaining safe current density levels through vertical field confinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables higher visual acuity by allowing pixels to be scaled down to cellular dimensions, improving spatial resolution and reducing cross-talk, potentially achieving better than 20/100 acuity in prosthetic vision.

Implementation Method 1

Walls surrounding each pixel align the electric field vertically, matching the orientation of bipolar cells in the retina, and thereby reduce the stimulation threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field alignment: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

Due to 1-dimensional alignment of electric field along the vertical walls of the honeycomb cavities, stimulation threshold current density does not increase significantly with the reduced pixel size

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field confinement: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentEP3946557B1Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface for retinal prosthesis
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • EP3946557B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2A
  • EP3946557B1 patent drawingFigure 2B
  • EP3946557B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3D

AI summary

We provide a 3-dimensional configuration of an electrode array for neural cell stimulation designed to leverage migration of retinal cells into voids in the subretinal space. Walls surrounding each pixel align the electric field vertically, matching the orientation of bipolar cells in the retina, and thereby reduce the stimulation threshold. These walls also decouple the field penetration depth from the pixel width, enabling a decrease of the pixel size down to cellular dimensions. Inner retinal cells migrate into the electrode cavities, which enables very efficient stimulation. Due to 1-dimensional alignment of electric field along the cavities, stimulation threshold current density does not increase significantly with the reduced pixel size, unlike the quadratic increase seen with planar arrays.