Honeycomb Structure Outer Wall Protrusions Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Honeycomb structures formed with silicon carbide suffer from thermal shock and separation issues due to repeated heating and cooling during particulate matter regeneration, leading to detachment of segments and reduced isostatic strength.

Innovation Solution

The honeycomb structure features thicker outer peripheral walls with protruding and depressed portions, increasing bonding strength with the bonding member and enhancing isostatic strength, while maintaining effective particulate matter trapping and thermal capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If honeycomb segments are bonded with a bonding material at side faces, then the honeycomb structure can be assembled, but detachment occurs due to repeated heating and cooling causing separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidstructural integrity under thermal cycling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The outer peripheral wall is divided into multiple protruding portions that contact the bonding member at multiple discrete locations, distributing thermal stress and preventing detachment during repeated heating and cooling cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The outer peripheral wall features an asymmetric profile with protruding portions that create unequal contact zones with the bonding member, optimizing the bonding interface to resist both tensile and compression stresses during thermal cycling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Volume of stationary object

If the honeycomb structure is made larger to improve filtration capacity, then more particulate matter can be trapped, but thermal shock causes defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capacityVSAvoidresistance to thermal shock
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The large honeycomb structure is divided into multiple smaller segments that are bonded together, allowing each segment to better withstand thermal shock while maintaining the overall large volume needed for high filtration capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure combines ceramic honeycomb segments with a bonding material that has appropriate thermal expansion properties, creating a composite structure that resists thermal shock while maintaining structural integrity at large sizes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If thin partition walls are used to increase cell density, then more cells can be packed, but isostatic strength decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell densityVSAvoidisostatic strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The outer peripheral wall thickness is increased in the radial dimension while maintaining thin partition walls in the axial dimension, providing structural strength without reducing cell density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design inhibits separation of honeycomb segments, improves isostatic strength, and suppresses maximum temperature during regeneration, thereby extending the regeneration limit and maintaining efficient particulate matter trapping.

Implementation Method 1

The bonding of the segments is performed by the use of a bonding material, which is applied on a side face (outer peripheral wall) of a predetermined segment, and a plurality of segments are bonded together at the side faces to obtain a honeycomb structure where a plurality of segments are bonded by means of the bonding member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

Since silicon carbide has relatively large thermal expansion coefficient, a honeycomb structure formed with silicon carbide as the framework may cause a defect due to thermal shock upon use if the size is large

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

combustion of trapped particulate matter (regeneration) is repeated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP2233454B1Honeycomb structure
Publication Date: 2013.09.18 NGK INSULATORS LTD
  • EP2233454B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2233454B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2233454B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

There is provided a honeycomb structure 100 comprising a plurality of honeycomb segments 4 having porous partition walls 2 separating and forming a plurality of cells 1 and an outer peripheral wall 3 located in the outermost periphery and being thicker than the partition walls 2, first cells 1a each open in an end portion on one side and plugged in the other end portion on the other side and second cells 1b each plugged in the end portion on the one side and open in the other end portion on the other side being alternately disposed with the first cells 1a having an area larger than that of the second cells 1b in a cross section perpendicular to the central axial direction, and the outer peripheral wall 3 having protruding portions along an external shape of the first cells 1a and depressed portions 1b along an external shape of the second cells 1b. The honeycomb segments 4 are bonded to each other with a bonding member.