Hook Spin Damping Mechanism Using Friction and Eddy Currents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Undamped free rotation of lifting hooks in hoist systems, such as those used in helicopter rescue devices, poses an operational safety hazard due to amplified rotation rates caused by aerodynamic and inertial forces, leading to potential twisting and binding of lifting cables.

Innovation Solution

A hook assembly with a spin damping mechanism that includes a spring arm assembly and a conductive non-magnetic member, generating friction and eddy current brake forces proportional to the rotation rate, effectively damping both clockwise and anti-clockwise rotations to prevent excessive rotation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If free rotation of the lifting hook is enabled to inhibit twisting and binding of lifting cables, then cable safety is improved, but the rotation rate may be amplified by aerodynamic and inertial forces creating operational safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable safetyVSAvoidexcessive rotation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pure mechanical friction damping with electromagnetic damping using a magnetic drag assembly. The assembly includes a magnet assembly and a conductive plate that generates electromagnetic damping forces proportional to rotation rate, providing controlled damping without the limitations of mechanical friction systems. This substitution enables reliable damping of excessive rotation while maintaining cable safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the damping parameter from fixed mechanical friction to variable electromagnetic damping that is proportional to rotation rate. The magnetic drag assembly generates damping forces that automatically adjust with rotation speed, providing higher damping at high rotation rates (when hazards occur) and lower damping at low rotation rates (when free rotation is beneficial for cable safety).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If aerodynamic forces from main rotor downwash are present during reel in/out operations, then lifting operations can be performed, but rotation of the suspended load is caused which may be amplified and sustained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting operation capabilityVSAvoidload rotation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic drag assembly provides passive feedback damping where the damping force automatically increases with rotation rate. As aerodynamic forces cause the load to rotate, the increasing rotation rate generates proportionally increasing electromagnetic damping forces that counteract the rotation, providing self-regulating stability without active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Power

If rotational coupling between the main rotor and the suspended load occurs, then rotation is amplified and sustained, but this creates operational safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation amplificationVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes mechanical friction-based rotational restraint with electromagnetic damping that can effectively counteract high-power rotational coupling. The magnetic drag assembly generates damping forces proportional to rotation rate, providing sufficient counter-torque to prevent operational safety hazards from rotational coupling while allowing controlled rotation for cable protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The spin damping mechanism effectively reduces the rotation rate of the hook, enhancing operational safety by applying a braking force that is self-regulating across a wide range of rotational rates, combining friction and eddy current damping for efficient control.

Implementation Method 1

a first friction surface is disposed within the housing... the second friction surface contacts the first friction surface in response to the rotation of the hook and generates a friction brake force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a conductive non-magnetic member is disposed within the housing, and a magnetic member is disposed within the housing and configured to rotate relative to the conductive non-magnetic member in response to the rotation of the hook, wherein an eddy current brake force is generated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentEP3943436B1Axial rotation damping mechanism
Publication Date: 2024.07.10 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3943436B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3943436B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3943436B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A damping mechanism may comprise a housing (306), a shaft, a spring arm assembly (402) including a first spring arm (410A), wherein the spring arm assembly is coupled to the shaft and configured to rotate in response to a rotation of the shaft, wherein the first spring arm extends relatively radially outward of the spring arm assembly toward the housing in response to the rotation of the shaft, and wherein the rotation of the shaft is damped in response to extending the first spring arm.