Hopper and Piston Feeder for Robotic Workcells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for orienting and feeding loose components, such as vibratory feeders and tape-and-reel systems, are inefficient and costly, as they are often designed for single component types and require significant effort or expense, failing to provide a simple and adaptable solution for providing components in a known location and orientation.

Innovation Solution

A hopper and piston apparatus where the piston has a receptacle at its upper end to accept components in a determined orientation, allowing components to fall into the receptacle as the piston is lowered and raised, ensuring components are fed one at a time in a defined orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If vibratory feeders are used to accept loose components and provide them in a known orientation, then components are fed in a defined orientation, but the device becomes big, noisy, expensive to design, and designed for only a single size and type of component

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent orientation precisionVSAvoidfeeder size and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feeder is segmented into a hopper for storing multiple components and a single receptacle that processes one component at a time. The piston divides the feeding process into discrete steps, handling one component per cycle, which simplifies the overall device structure while maintaining orientation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The receptacle is designed with a universal geometry that can accommodate different sizes and types of components. The same receptacle structure works for various component forms (e.g., cylindrical, rectangular, irregular shapes) by adjusting the piston motion and receptacle dimensions, eliminating the need for multiple specialized feeders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If tape-and-reel is used to provide components, then components are supplied in a controlled manner, but significant effort is required to supply components in this configuration and it is not cost-effective for many parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent supply controlVSAvoidpreparation effort and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows loose components to be freely deposited into the hopper without requiring pre-assembly onto tape substrates. The piston automatically performs the selection and orientation functions that would otherwise require manual preparation, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating costly pre-processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple components are pre-loaded into the hopper in advance, and the piston retrieves them one at a time when needed. This preliminary loading eliminates the need for on-demand component preparation and reduces operational effort while maintaining controlled supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If loose components are accepted and oriented using traditional methods, then components are provided in a known orientation, but the process is expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent orientationVSAvoidfeeding speed and cost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The piston performs periodic reciprocating motions, retrieving one component at a time from the hopper and delivering it to the receptacle in rhythmic cycles. This periodic action maintains precise orientation control while enabling continuous high-speed operation, improving productivity compared to continuous vibratory methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The complex continuous vibratory mechanical system is replaced with a simpler reciprocating piston mechanism. The piston uses controlled linear motion and gravitational force to achieve component orientation and delivery, reducing mechanical complexity and operational costs while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a simple, adaptable, and cost-effective method for feeding components to a robot, ensuring they are presented in a known location and orientation, enhancing efficiency and reducing the need for expensive and bulky vibratory feeders.

Implementation Method 1

lowering a piston within a channel that passes through the bottom of the bin until a top of the piston is below the bottom of the bin, allowing one of the plurality of components to fall into the channel and then into a receptacle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10800601B2Feeder for a robotic workcell
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 K2R2
  • US10800601B2 patent drawing
  • US10800601B2 patent drawing
  • US10800601B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for the acceptance of loose components and feeding of individual components in a known position and orientation are disclosed.