Railcar Hopper Removal Tackle System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for removing drawer-type hoppers from bulk railroad cars are inefficient, unsafe, and time-consuming, requiring extreme physical effort and prolonged maintenance downtime.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical device with a tackle system, comprising a first and second support base, a drag mechanism with a pulley and chain, and an arm mechanism, allows for the linear removal of the hopper from the car, eliminating the need for blowtorches and mallets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual methods (blowtorches and mallets) are used to remove hoppers, then the removal process can be performed with simple tools, but the process becomes extremely dangerous and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of toolsVSAvoidhopper removal time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a tackle system with pulleys and chains as an intermediary mechanical device between the workers and the hopper. This mediator provides mechanical advantage, allowing workers to move the heavy hopper with reduced effort and in a controlled manner, resolving the contradiction between tool simplicity and removal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The removal process is segmented into distinct phases: positioning the tackle system, attaching hooks to the hopper, gradually extracting the hopper using the tackle, and final removal. This segmentation allows the complex task to be performed systematically with simple tools while reducing overall time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If manual methods (blowtorches and mallets) are used to remove hoppers, then the equipment required is minimal, but the process becomes extremely dangerous requiring extreme physical effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The tackle system acts as a safe intermediary that transfers the force required for hopper removal from direct human physical effort to a mechanical system. This eliminates the need for dangerous blowtorches and mallets while distributing the physical effort across multiple workers operating the pulley system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the dangerous thermal and impact methods (blowtorches and mallets) with a pure mechanical advantage system using pulleys and chains. This substitution eliminates harmful factors while maintaining equipment simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If traditional manual removal methods are used, then the device complexity remains low, but the productivity is very low with prolonged maintenance downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval system complexityVSAvoidhopper replacement rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tackle system serves as a mechanical mediator that enables faster hopper removal by providing controlled movement and mechanical advantage. This intermediary device increases productivity from 8 hoppers per day to potentially higher rates while maintaining relatively simple equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The tackle system is positioned and prepared in advance before the actual hopper removal begins. The hooks are attached to the hopper beforehand, and the mechanical advantage system is set up to enable rapid extraction, thereby increasing overall productivity while keeping the device relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device significantly reduces hopper removal time from 40 minutes to 10 minutes, enhances safety, and increases productivity by enabling the replacement of 24 hoppers from 6 cars per day, compared to 8 hoppers from 2 cars previously.

Implementation Method 1

a tackle fastened on the first support base; the tackle comprising a first hook associated to the drawer-type hopper, the first hook and the drawer-type hopper being moved linearly by the tackle in the opposite direction of the railroad car

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPulley: Pulley

Implementation Method 2

a tackle fastened on the first support base; the tackle comprising a first hook associated to the drawer-type hopper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS9284170B2Device for removing hoppers from rail cars
Publication Date: 2016.03.15 VALE SA
  • US9284170B2 patent drawing
  • US9284170B2 patent drawing
  • US9284170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is described a device for removing a drawer-type hopper of a railroad car, the device comprising: a first support base positioned on a platform and a second support base supported on the railroad car; and a tackle fastened on the first support base; the tackle comprising a first hook associated to the drawer-type hopper, the first hook and the drawer-type hopper being moved linearly by the tackle in the opposite direction of the railroad car.