Horizontal Dry Mill Screw Gap Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing horizontal dry mills face issues with raw material blow-up and adhesion to the input section due to centrifugal forces, leading to clogging and reduced grinding efficiency, especially when processing materials with low specific gravity or high cohesion.

Innovation Solution

The horizontal dry mill design incorporates a raw material supply section with a diameter smaller than the grinding chamber, and a mechanical thrust generating device with a reduced diameter, along with a gap between the screw and the grinding tank to minimize centrifugal forces, and uses a plate-like agitation member with specific gaps to prevent adhesion and buildup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a conventional horizontal dry mill with simple arm agitation elements is used, then the structure is simple, but raw material with high flowability passes through the grinding chamber without filling the upper region, resulting in short retention time and poor grinding efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding efficiencyVSAvoidagitation member structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The agitation member is segmented into multiple functional components: a rotary shaft, multiple arms extending radially, and lifting elements (such as blades or protrusions) attached to the arms. This segmentation allows each component to perform a specific function - the arms provide structural support while the lifting elements actively engage the raw material to prevent it from passing through unchanged, thereby improving grinding efficiency without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Duration of action of moving object

If a mechanical thrust generating device with large diameter is used to increase retention time, then centrifugal force increases and material blows up and adheres to the input section, causing clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention timeVSAvoidmaterial adhesion and clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the diameter parameter of the mechanical thrust generating device to a specific range that balances two opposing requirements: it is large enough to generate sufficient centrifugal force for adequate retention time, but small enough to avoid excessive blow-up and adhesion of material to the input section. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between retention time and clogging prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the gap between the screw and grinding tank is reduced to prevent material buildup, then material is effectively contained, but the device complexity increases and maintenance becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of material buildupVSAvoiddevice fabrication and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies an optimal gap range between the screw (mechanical thrust generating device) and the grinding tank wall. This gap is small enough to effectively contain material and prevent buildup that would reduce grinding efficiency, but large enough to allow for practical manufacturing tolerances and ease of maintenance. The parameter optimization balances reliability with manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively suppresses clogging and adhesion, allowing for improved retention time and grinding efficiency by reducing centrifugal forces and preventing material buildup on the inner walls and separation members.

Implementation Method 1

a screw serving as a mechanical thrust generating device disposed on the side of the one end of the grinding chamber... a raw material input into the grinding chamber through the material input nozzle is thrust toward the discharge section by the screw

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

it is agitated together with the grinding media and pulverized by means of mutual friction, shear, etc.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

it is agitated together with the grinding media and pulverized by means of mutual friction, shear, etc.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 4

whereafter a resulting pulverized product is separated from the grinding media by the separator and discharged from the discharge section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentEP2789392B1Horizontal dry mill
Publication Date: 2021.05.26 ASHIZAWA FINETECH
  • EP2789392B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2789392B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2789392B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

It is intended to, in a horizontal dry mill, prevent blow-up and adhesion of a raw material, etc., to a raw material input section. In a horizontal dry mill (10) of the present invention, a diameter of a raw material supply section (13) provided in a grinding tank (14) is set to be less than a diameter of a grinding chamber (12). Further, a diameter of a mechanical thrust generating device of the raw material supply section (13) is set to a small value according to the diameter of the raw material supply section. Furthermore, a gap (e1) between an outside dimension of a screw (26) as the mechanical thrust generating device and an inner diameter of the grinding tank (14) in the raw material supply section (13) is set between 0.5 mm and 1/3 of a diameter of each grinding medium M.