Vehicle Horn-Triggered Visual Alerts for Distracted Pedestrians

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pedestrians and vehicle operators often fail to notice approaching vehicles due to distractions or hearing impairments, as they may not hear audio alerts like horn honking, leading to dangerous situations.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle alert system that provides a non-audible visual alert using lights, integrated with the horn system and a mobile application, to alert pedestrians and vehicles through a visual warning when the horn is actuated, ensuring awareness without relying solely on audio cues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If audio alerts (horn honking) are used to alert pedestrians and vehicles, then the alert system is simple and effective for hearing individuals, but it fails to reach pedestrians who are distracted, wearing headphones, or have hearing impairments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidcoverage of different user groups
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single auditory dimension to multiple dimensions by introducing visual alerts (lights) and tactile alerts (vibrations) alongside audio alerts. This multi-dimensional approach ensures that at least one alert modality reaches the user regardless of their distraction level or hearing capability, thereby resolving the contradiction between alert effectiveness and coverage of different user groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The alert system is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: auditory alerting, visual alerting, and tactile alerting. This multi-functional design allows the same system to serve diverse user needs - hearing individuals rely on audio alerts while those with hearing impairments or distractions can perceive visual or tactile signals, thus achieving both reliability and adaptability across different user groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple alert modalities (visual, tactile, audio) are integrated into the system, then coverage of different user groups is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of different user groupsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple alert modalities (visual, tactile, audio) into a single integrated alert system that can be activated through one interface. By merging these functions into a unified system controlled by a single actuation area, the patent reduces operational complexity while maintaining multi-modal alerting capabilities, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The alert system is designed as a multi-functional unit that can operate in different modes (audio-only, visual-only, tactile-only, or combinations thereof) based on user needs. This universal design allows the system to adapt to various user groups without requiring separate systems for each modality, thereby achieving broad coverage while managing overall system complexity through integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If visual alert devices are added to the vehicle, then alert effectiveness for distracted pedestrians is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements visual alert devices at specific strategic locations on the vehicle (front, rear, and side areas) rather than uniformly across the entire vehicle surface. This localized approach ensures that alerts are directed toward areas where pedestrians are most likely to be present, maximizing alert effectiveness while minimizing the number of devices required and thus controlling manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively alerts pedestrians and vehicles to potential hazards by providing a visual warning that complements the audio horn, enhancing safety by reaching individuals who are distracted or have hearing impairments.

Implementation Method 1

The non-audible or visual alert device may comprise one or more lights

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS11993204B2Vehicle and pedestrian alert system and vehicle including an alert system
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 SMITH JR RONALD E
  • US11993204B2 patent drawing
  • US11993204B2 patent drawing
  • US11993204B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle alert system and method are provided. The vehicle alert system and method provide for a non-audible alert upon actuation of an actuation area, such as a car horn. The non-audible alert may include operating or actuating one or more lights. A mobile application may be provided for providing an alert in response to the actuation of the actuation area.