Horological Anchor Elastic Lips for Wear and Shock Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing escapement mechanisms in watch movements suffer from wear and degradation due to incessant shocks, leading to reduced efficiency and amplitude, with existing solutions like surface coatings, material choices, and bearings either delaying shock effects or being incompatible with the mechanical kinematics of anchors and balance wheels.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of micrometric slots or chambers in the anchor's horns to create elastic lips that absorb and distribute impact forces, maintaining mechanical strength while reducing wear by making the contact zone between the anchor and balance wheel elastic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If surface coatings or special materials are used, then wear resistance is improved, but shock attenuation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidshock attenuation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by creating elastic lips through micrometric slots or chambers in the anchor's horns. These elastic lips act as flexible elements that can deform under shock loads, providing shock attenuation while maintaining wear resistance at the contact surfaces. The elastic deformation absorbs impact energy without compromising the hardness or wear resistance of the contact zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the anchor horn material from purely rigid to elastically deformable by introducing micrometric slots or chambers. This parameter change allows the material to exhibit both wear resistance (through hardened contact surfaces) and shock attenuation (through elastic deformation of the elastic lips), resolving the contradiction between these two requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If bearings are used, then friction is reduced, but compatibility with shock-loaded kinematics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction reductionVSAvoidcompatibility with shock-loaded kinematics
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the bearing-based friction reduction mechanism with an elastic lip-based shock absorption mechanism. Instead of using bearings that are incompatible with shock loads, the invention uses elastic lips that naturally accommodate shock-loaded kinematics through elastic deformation, providing both friction reduction and shock compatibility without requiring bearing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Weight of moving object

If lever arm length is reduced, then inertia is reduced, but modification of existing movement kinematics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinertia reductionVSAvoidmodification of existing movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing micrometric slots or chambers only in specific zones of the anchor horns where elasticity is needed, rather than changing the overall dimensions or inertia of the entire lever arm. This localized modification allows the existing movement kinematics to remain unchanged while providing shock attenuation benefits at the critical contact points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-configuring the elastic lips through micrometric slots or chambers during manufacturing, so that the shock attenuation capability is built into the component itself. This allows the existing movement to be used as-is without requiring modification of kinematics or replacement of other components, simply by equipping the anchor with this pre-designed elastic feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If elastic elements are introduced, then shock attenuation is improved, but mechanical strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock attenuationVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses thin film elastic lips created by micrometric slots or chambers that are specifically designed to deform elastically under shock loads. These thin elastic elements provide shock attenuation while maintaining overall mechanical strength because the elastic deformation is localized and reversible, and the contact surfaces retain their full strength for load-bearing functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent carefully controls the parameters of the elastic lips (thickness, slot width, chamber size) to ensure that the elastic deformation remains within acceptable limits that do not compromise mechanical strength. By optimizing these parameters, the invention achieves shock attenuation while maintaining the necessary structural integrity and mechanical strength for the anchor to function reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces wear and maintains mechanical integrity by ensuring deformations remain within the elastic range, thereby enhancing the longevity and efficiency of the escapement mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

ensuring deformations remain within the elastic range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2413202B1Method for improving the wear and impact resistance of an horological component. Anchor for clock movement with wear and impact resistance
Publication Date: 2017.11.15 ETA SA MFG HORLOGERE SUISSE
  • EP2413202B1 patent drawingFigure 1~8
  • EP2413202B1 patent drawingFigure 9~10

AI summary

The method involves providing flexibility to end horns (3, 4) by arrangement of micrometric slots (5, 6) or chamber in proximity to a contact surface or surfaces, to delimit elastic lips (20, 21) extending between the contact surface and the micrometric slots or chamber. The slot or chamber is realized in a manner to perpendicular to a plane (P) along which a timepiece movement component is developed, where the plane is orthogonal to the contact surface or contact surfaces. An independent claim is also included for a pallet assembly for an escapement mechanism of a timepiece movement.