Hospital Bed Software Offloading to Remote Server

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As patient support systems like hospital beds become more complex, they require increased computing power, leading to resource consumption and safety standard compliance issues for both critical and non-critical software components. Additionally, caregivers face challenges in controlling multiple devices, risking contamination and inefficiency due to the need to interact with numerous surfaces and devices within a patient room.

Innovation Solution

A system where a mobile computing device acts as a user interface for patient support apparatuses, communicating with a remote server to offload non-critical processing and control multiple patient care devices through a universal caregiver interface, reducing the need for direct interaction with each device and minimizing surface contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If computing power is increased to support expanded functionality of patient support systems, then system capabilities are improved, but resource consumption and safety standard compliance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts non-critical computing functions from the patient support system to a remote server. The patient support system retains only essential functions locally while offloading non-essential processing, communication, and data management tasks to the remote server, thereby reducing local resource consumption while maintaining expanded system capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a remote server as an intermediary between the patient support system and external computing resources. This intermediary handles non-critical processing tasks, allowing the patient support system to access expanded functionality without bearing the full computational burden locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more software applications are added to patient support systems, then system versatility is improved, but compliance with safety standards becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware functionalityVSAvoidsafety standard compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts non-critical software functions from the patient support system to a remote server. By moving non-essential applications and processing tasks off the medical device, the system reduces the software that requires stringent medical device certification while maintaining versatility through remote access to additional functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If caregivers interact with multiple device surfaces to control various equipment, then device control capability is improved, but contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice controlVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges control of multiple patient care devices into a single unified interface. The remote server provides a centralized control point that allows caregivers to monitor and control various devices (bed, lift, IV pump, etc.) through one interface, reducing the number of physical surfaces touched while maintaining comprehensive device control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal caregiver interface that can control multiple different types of patient care devices. This multi-functional interface consolidates device control capabilities, allowing a single interface to perform functions that previously required interacting with multiple separate device controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Extent of automation

If computing requirements are processed locally on patient support systems, then system independence is improved, but processing load on the device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal processing capabilityVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts computing requirements from the local patient support system and transfers them to a remote server. Non-critical processing tasks are removed from the device, reducing local processing load and device complexity while maintaining automated functionality through remote execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3002695B1Hospital bed compatibility with third party application software
Publication Date: 2022.01.26 HILL ROM SERVICES INC
  • EP3002695B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3002695B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3002695B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system includes a remote computer device and a patient bed in communication with the remote computer device. The patient bed has circuitry operable by a user to obtain at least one software application from the remote computer device. The system also has an authentication software module that verifies that the at least one software application is authorized for use on the patient bed.