Host Executable Permission Checks for Privilege Escalation Risks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to reliably detect privilege escalation vulnerabilities in computer systems before they occur, making it difficult to prevent attacks and react to threats effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for detecting privilege escalation risks by examining executables running on a host, identifying those with elevated privileges, and checking file access permissions to detect potential vulnerabilities, generating alerts for writable and modifiable executables with lower privileges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If code analysis or analysis of freshly installed applications is performed, then general vulnerability detection is possible, but host-specific privilege escalation vulnerabilities cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection accuracyVSAvoidhost-specific vulnerability detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of executable files and their permissions before privilege escalation can occur. By checking file access permissions and identifying executables that can be modified by lower privilege levels in advance, the system detects vulnerabilities before they are exploited, enabling preventive security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables hosts to self-diagnose their own privilege escalation vulnerabilities by analyzing their local executable files and permission configurations. Each host independently identifies its own specific vulnerabilities through automated scanning of executable permissions and modification rights, without requiring external analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If detection is performed after privilege escalation occurs, then confirmed threats can be identified, but response time is delayed and prevention is impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat confirmation accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs vulnerability detection in advance by analyzing executable file permissions and identifying potential privilege escalation paths before attacks occur. This preliminary detection enables organizations to remediate vulnerabilities proactively, eliminating the time loss associated with post-escalation detection and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If traditional malware scanning is used, then known malware can be detected, but unknown privilege escalation vulnerabilities remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknown malware detection accuracyVSAvoidunknown vulnerability detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of scanning for known malware signatures, the system inverts the approach by scanning for permission configurations and executable attributes that could enable privilege escalation. It identifies vulnerabilities based on file system permissions and executable modification rights rather than malware content, enabling detection of unknown and zero-day privilege escalation threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20260003975A1Arrangement and method of privilege escalation detection in a host
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 F SECURE CORP
  • US20260003975A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003975A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003975A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of privilege escalation risk detection in a host, such as a computer, and/or a network, such as a computer network, is disclosed. The method comprises: examining which executables are running in the host, searching, e.g. from a behavioral data source, behavioral information of the executables running in the host, performing a first identification phase for identifying executables running in the host which the behavioral information indicates are known to be run with an elevated privilege, performing a second identification phase by checking file access permissions to the executables identified in the first identification phase for identifying executables which are writable and/or modifiable by a privilege level lower than the elevated privilege, e.g. a privilege level other than administrator or system level privileges, and generating an alert for the executables identified in the second identification phase.