Hot-fill Container Dome Design for Top-Load Collapse Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic containers lack structural rigidity, making them susceptible to collapse under external downward vertical forces, such as those encountered during filling, storage, transportation, and display, leading to frequent failures.

Innovation Solution

A dome-designed plastic container featuring hydrostatic pressure absorption panels and a circumferential ring that absorb a substantial portion of the downward force, allowing the container to restore its original shape and geometry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If plastic containers are used instead of traditional containers, then advantages such as lighter weight and lower cost are achieved, but structural rigidity is insufficient causing collapse under top-load forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer weightVSAvoidstructural rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The container body is divided into multiple sections with vertically extending ribs that create compartmentalized structures. These ribs segment the wall into regions that can independently deform and absorb energy, preventing catastrophic collapse while maintaining overall structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container incorporates a domed top and curved body sections instead of flat surfaces. The curved geometry distributes applied loads more effectively across the structure, enhancing structural rigidity and resistance to collapsing under top-load forces while maintaining the lightweight plastic construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Productivity

If plastic containers are stacked and stored in trays or during shipment, then storage efficiency is improved, but top-load forces increase dramatically causing bottle failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidcontainer durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The container design incorporates built-in structural features such as reinforced domed tops, curved body sections, and ribbed walls that are pre-engineered to absorb and distribute top-load forces. These features act as cushioning elements that protect the container from collapse during stacking and transportation before actual failure can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The container utilizes changes in geometric parameters including domed curvature radius, rib height and spacing, and wall thickness distribution to optimize structural performance. These parameter variations enable the container to withstand dramatically increased top-load forces during stacking while maintaining lightweight construction for efficient storage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the container structure is reinforced to withstand top-load forces, then structural rigidity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetop-load resistanceVSAvoidcontainer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is segmented into modular components including a domed top section, curved body sections with vertically extending ribs, and a base section. These segmented elements work together to provide enhanced top-load resistance through distributed load paths while maintaining relatively simple individual component geometries that are easy to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The domed top and curved body sections provide structural reinforcement through geometric curvature rather than adding complex mechanical components. The curved surfaces naturally distribute applied forces across larger areas, achieving enhanced strength with minimal increase in manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances the container's ability to withstand 80% to 200% greater downward forces compared to similar containers without these features, preventing collapse and restoring the original shape after force removal.

Implementation Method 1

the hydrostatic pressure absorption panels move outwardly to absorb at least a substantial portion of the positive, internal pressure in the container resulting from the application of the external downwardly directed vertical force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure absorption: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the design in accordance with the invention allows the bottle to typically withstand about 80% greater downwardly directed force compared to a similar bottle without the hydrostatic pressure absorption panels and the circumferential ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentUS7661548B2Hot-fill container with improved top-load performance
Publication Date: 2010.02.16 STOKLEY VAN CAMP INC
  • US7661548B2 patent drawing
  • US7661548B2 patent drawing
  • US7661548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plastic container comprising a base that is attached to a body section which is connected to a dome section by a circumferential ring is provided. The dome section comprises a plurality of circumferentially spaced hydrostatic pressure absorption panels each located between vertically extending, circumferentially spaced ribs that absorbs at least a substantial portion of the external downwardly directed vertical forces exerted on the container and restores the container to its original shape. In addition, a method of absorbing a downward, vertical top-load is provided.